Talk:Romance studies
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Talk:Romance studies
[edit]Is there any possibility of finding out where Romance studies are heavily used or where they initiated originally from? Who are some individuals00:43, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Dante0526 (talk) who have contributed to Romance studies?
Dante0526 (talk) 00:43, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- I don't have the book available just now, so I can't give pages, but for the question of origins of Romance Philology, the most thorough account is still the opening chapters of Carlo Tagliavini's Le origini delle lingue neolatine, preferably an edition 1969 or later.
- As for the assumption in the article that Romance Studies = Romance Philology... I know or know of quite a few people who "do" Romance studies who would be very surprised to learn that they're Romance philologists. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 20:47, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- I added an individual who is highly relevant in the field of Romance Philology, including references to all sources mentioned. @Dante0526Yennyferr (talk) 23:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi everyone! I've made some pretty sizeable edits to the page, feel free to edit and move around anything you find incorrect. I'm very new to Wikipedia editing, but I'd love to become more fluent in understanding how to properly format my chosen pages. I look forward to cooperating with all of you. :) Yennyferr (talk) 02:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Journals plural or Journal singular?
[edit]Romance Philology is the only journal worth mentioning? Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 20:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)