This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Craft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of craft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CraftWikipedia:WikiProject CraftTemplate:WikiProject CraftCraft articles
I have taken the task of removing completly the section on output until someone rewrite a better version.
The source used is the farthest thing from the truth and uses a completly, a word that I wish to print on the mind of everyone here, fallacious reasoning :
Taking the production of a small region specialized in iron production and scaling to the entire empire is complete stupidity, to think someone wrote such garbage and that other stupid and/or biased people are copy pasting throught the web is even more unbelievable.
The actual figure of industrial output of the roman empire is very difficult to know but know it for a fact, it's most likely not a even a fifth of that, the backward technological base of the roman empire that did not even have blast furnace, actual industrial centers, an economy based around ineffecient slave man power, and the lack of anything other than wrought iron and bronze is proof enough that the roman empire could have near even the figure stated by these so called historians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.239.55.3 (talk) 19:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The entry for annual output of gold is suspect. It is listed as 9 tons, but, according to Diodorus xvi.8 [1], the output of Philippi alone was 1,000 talents (~50 tons) per year during Philip II's reign (ca. 300bc).
All sorts of numbers are thrown around, no one knows how much gold was found in the roman empire. In Las medulas gold mine the security detail alone involved an entire legion, that is ~5000 soldiers and they did not work for free. Add to that the cost of transport, building the infrastructure and the paid workers (thousands) building the aqueducts, mining the mountains and separating the gold, and we are talking about a very expensive operation that have to had run a surplus or the mine would have made no sense at all.
The entire roman empire at the peak would have had hundreds of gold mine involving hundreds of thousands of people working, most of them paid as the slaves we deemed inefficient and replace by paid miners who extracted more wealth at a much higher rate out of the mines, this happened already during the republican era. 79.159.202.35 (talk) 16:56, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
