Talk:Rollercoaster (Phineas and Ferb)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rollercoaster (Phineas and Ferb) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Rollercoaster (Phineas and Ferb) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 June 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that it took 16 years for the pilot episode of Phineas and Ferb to be picked up?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/June.

Wikipedia

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Image

Um... could we change the image? The one on the Phineas and Ferb Wiki page of "Rollercoaster" is a much better one and it's a promotional poster. User: J.Severe —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.45.37.168 (talk) 22:28, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thanks! User: J.Severe

Can someone mention the song Major Monogram sings. I don't know the name, but it's the one that starts : My whole world is a screen... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.227.18 (talk) 11:20, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Only? or one of two? episodes without a musical number

For a while the lede of this article contained the text "It should also be noted that the original Rollercoaster is the only episode in the series to not have a musical number." It was changed today by Andrewmhhs in this edit from "only episode" to "one of two episodes". I tagged this with {{fact}} in this edit, and the sentence was then deleted (quite rightly) by Cyphoidbomb because of the possibility of WP:OR. Does anyone know if there are any other episodes without a muscial number (preferably with a reliable source to back them up)? Ollieinc (talk) 03:15, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to thank you for opening the discussion, Ollieinc, although I don't have an answer. :) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:34, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rollercoaster (Phineas and Ferb)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

I have rated this article as B-class and low importance.

low importance: as a single episode, the article is of low importance to the wikiproject.

B-class: The article has good information, well sourced, and casual readers are not left wanting. My main concern with the article is the prose, which is highly important in good article assessments. For examples:

Vincent Martella and Thomas Sangster were cast to play the titular characters, along with Ashley Tisdale to play Candace, all three of which were hired by the casting department due to age-group popularity and general belief in their ability to perform each role.

Might be better worded as: Vincent Martella, Thomas Sangster, and Ashley Tisdale, who voice Phineas, Ferb, and Candace respectively, were all hired by the casting department because of their popularity within the target age-group popularity and general belief in their ability to perform their roles.

You might go on to explain how Martella, Sangster, and Tisdale achieved age-group popularity, if it flows with the rest of the article- it isn't necessary.

Another character, Jeremy, usually voiced by Mitchel Musso, briefly appeared in the episode in a completely different voice than usual from an unknown voice extra.

Might be better worded as: Jeremy, usually voiced by Mitchel Musso, was voiced instead by an unknown extra during a brief appearance in the episode."

You might go on to say when Musso was hired to play the role.

Don't all Phineas and Ferb episodes have music? It seemed like a pretty prominent feature on the main page.

Also, the caption for PitchPF .png might need work, but I'm not familiar with the requirements for captions. I think further explanation is required to relate the caption to the image- I.E., why does the image illustrate the caption? Is the image a storyboard image?

Hope those comments help. Good luck with the GA nomination! I might come back to review it myself if these concerns are fixed or explained. Thanks, Liquidluck (talk) 19:14, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 01:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 04:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)