Talk:Roland MC-808
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Bug list.
[edit]With all respect, I'll remove the bug list from the article, as I don't consider it is the function of Wikipedia to be a buglist or mailing list of some product.
- Whoever you are (remember to sign your messages), I'd argue that a lot of people go to wikipedia first when they are evaluating a product or service for purchase - the fact of bugs outstanding after two years is fairly significant, and useful to readers. - matt lohkamp 11:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Link Rot
[edit]I've removed these links as they no longer work. Actually I'll try pointing them to the Wayback Machine at archive.org.
Wow ! archive.org had a redirect to the live site !
This site uses 'stored searches', but doesn't store them for ever ! So the link only works for a while.
- [http://www.futureproducers.com/forums/production-techniques/sampling-digging/ FutureProducers.com forum - 'musicians learning from musicians' - Search 'MC808'. 'MC-808' finds other 808s like TR-808.
- 808 Revolution - At The best french forum web site www.MC909.org Some translation in English.
- mc909.org still exists as a 'homepage', last edited 3rd June 2010
- archive.org stores the page in the original link, but ...
- Google translate shows no useful info - just '909 is better'
- removed
- grooves Magazine Articles - Roland MC-808 Sampling Groovesbox - GEAR REVIEWS
- grooves Magazine Articles - Roland MC-808 Sampling Groovesbox - GEAR REVIEWS
Not sure it's worth it.
OK ?
--195.137.93.171 (talk) 08:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)