Talk:Roksan Xerxes

A fact from Roksan Xerxes appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 July 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Inspector Morse listened to a Xerxes?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Roksan Xerxes.

Wikipedia

Roksan Xerxes has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 15, 2014. (Reviewed version).

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Roksan Xerxes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: B137 (talk · contribs) 04:37, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

General, this article seems to already satisfy or very nearly satisfy the GAC. I noticed a couple of very minor things. It is certainly broad in it's scope and fairly well referenced (is "audiogon" a reliable source?); perhaps, as with the NAD 3020 article, more could be dug up to supersede some of the iffy sources. One quirk is the line that includes " attract the emotional involvement of the listener," this very idea is a bit controversial and it probably should not be included without an immediate footnote to a source that uses this wording, or better as an actual quote. B137 (talk) 04:37, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I've tweaked the language. I'd just like to say that this is not a claim. And bearing in mind that this is a statement of what the designer set out to achieve (rather than someone's perception of how it turned out), I reckon it could be acceptable, suitably cited. -- Ohc ^¡digame! 11:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- - You basically just repeated what I said should be done without actually doing it. That sentence should have its own footnote to a source that uses that language or be done as a quote, of course also with a citation. B137 (talk) 21:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, one last thing is it really appropriate to copy the entire specifications word for word from that single source?; which is a seller by the way. Also, which version fits those specs? B137 (talk) 19:20, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Henley Designs is the official UK distributor for Roksan, which makes the specs "official". I've made it less of a carbon copy, and I don't see how it can be made any less. It's a bullet list and not prose and I don't think the copying can be helped. -- Ohc ^¡digame! 04:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]