Jump to content

Talk:Roger W. Moss Jr.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Roger W. Moss, Jr.)

Untitled

[edit]

This article has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Back off, Toasty. I'm getting a little cranky. --Mothperson 20:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What is this "(preservationists)" crap, and "alleged"'s??? Suddenly it's a crime to be a well-known? Or to be called well-known when one is but the person using the word "alleged" doesn't like you? Or to be called a well-known preservationist when one actually is, but a person exists in the world who doesn't agree with one's beliefs? Jeezum crow, Toasty. Why don't you go make trouble in the all-so-important world of Wikipedia articles on New York television news - boy, there's a significant topic, or license plate collections, or the Jackie Gleason Bus Stop and give this one up, because YOU. WILL. NOT. WIN. HERE. I PROMISE. Go rewrite that ghastly stub about Frank Field (meteorologist) ("I think he's a medical doctor"). You've got soooo many stubs that need work. Get busy. Lazy lazy socks. Haven't read one substantive thing by you yet. --Mothperson 20:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Bloody Americans!

[edit]

I go look up Roger Moss and I find a bloody American! This whole thing is getting to damn Ameri-centric. I look at the history and I see that there was a page that gave an option for the American and the Welsh sculptor and it was removed. Typical American nonsense they thing they can control everything. Some bloody international encylopedia! Ameri-CentricPatrol 30 June 2005 13:29 (UTC)

Those who don't read article history are condemned to - uh, I guess have apoplexy. --Mothperson 30 June 2005 13:51 (UTC)

POV - This gentelman seems to be rather disputed

[edit]

This gentelman seems to be cause of great dispute, and the article seems to be slanted more in favour of Mr. Moss. Frühstücksdienst 19:30, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]