Talk:Robotomy/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 22:01, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

I'll review. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:01, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

@Zanimum: Thanks! ₂₃W (talk · stalk · pend) 22:22, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Infobox

• There are definitely adventure elements, are there... action I can see from this article, but without reading the episode summaries, I'm not seeing evidence in this article.
  • Removed—don't know how that got in there either. ₂₃W (talk · stalk · pend)
    • A drama film's article stood on Wikipedia as a comedy, until I corrected it a few months ago; it happens.

Lead

• A little reword here.
  • Thank you. ₂₃W (talk · stalk · pend)
• "is regarded as the shortest-running show on the network": there's no definitive answer?
  • Though only one source mentions this it seems pretty definite to me compared to all other original series on the network; rephrased. ₂₃W (talk · stalk · pend)

Plot

• "typically dating"... is he seeing other female robots in some episodes?
  • Not that I've seen; rephrased. ₂₃W (talk · stalk · pend)
• "; he is typically dating Maimy to Thrasher's disdain." --> "; to Thrasher's disdain, he is dating Maimy."
  • Done; thanks. ₂₃W (talk · stalk · pend)

Production

• The fact that Cartoon Network contacted Buckley, and kept bringing the duo in sounds like he had a good track record. Was he a showrunner before?
  • Incredibly, this is his only television credit. He's an author by profession; should I include this somewhere? ₂₃W (talk · stalk · pend)

Passes Checklinks.

Passing External links.

There's more for me to review, but here's a bit. -- Zanimum (talk) 17:47, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

• @Zanimum: Thank you for your comments! ₂₃W (talk · stalk · pend) 18:45, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

• • I've reworded a bit of the Production section, but mainly it was reordering a few sentences of the last two paragraphs, to get all the design comments and all the design comments together. The article seems to be in good shape now, so GA! -- Zanimum (talk) 18:14, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
    • @Zanimum: Sorry for this late reply. You're copy edits make it look much better—thanks so much for taking the time to review this! ₂₃W (talk · stalk · pend) 02:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)