Jump to content

Talk:Robinson Díaz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 6 June 2018

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested with a hatnote added to this article, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 21:43, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Robinson Díaz (actor)Robinson Díaz – Currently both Robinson Diaz and Robinson Díaz (note the different spellings with the accent on the "i") exist as redirects to the baseball player Robinzon Díaz. However, an article has recently been created for the Colombian actor Robinson Díaz (actor) – the article is wholly justified as he is widely regarded within Colombia as one of the country's best actors, with several starring roles on stage and on screen, and plenty of coverage about him from reliable sources, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4], etc. I think as there are no other articles for people called Robinson Díaz (with that specific spelling) on Wikipedia, Robinson Díaz (actor) should be moved to the current redirect Robinson Díaz, the other redirect Robinson Diaz should now point to the actor's article, and hatnotes placed on both the actor and baseball player's articles saying "For the baseball player, see..."/"For the Colombian actor, see..." Richard3120 (talk) 22:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Anthony Appleyard, I understand the issue about the accents, and that while Robinzon Díaz was the only Wikipedia article with this name, it made sense to redirect the possible variations to him. The issue is more with the "s"/"z" spellings in the first name - effectively by having the disambiguation, the actor's article is taking second place to the redirect. But if you feel this is a contested move, I have no problem opening it up for debate and consensus. Richard3120 (talk) 10:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.