Talk:Robert Polidori

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Photography: History

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:52, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Controversy"

This section needs to be rewritten or removed due to misinformation or content errors. Reason 1: there were no people/dead bodies in the printed or exhibited images "After the Flood". Reason 2: the Katrina image was used by a nonprofit and not commercially. It also doesn't conform to Wikipedia standards for "Controversy" which is by definition means "disagreement, typically when prolonged, public, and heated". And it does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for reliable sources as blogs are not published information sources and many of the referred blog's are no longer up. HeatherBlack (talk) 17:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Updated entry"

Please note I removed the Controversy section, but in "Equipment and Approach" added Alec Soth's blog as a reference for the debate on "unpeopled" images and kept MacCash's blog as a criticism of use of a "Katrinia" image in anti-smoking ad. HeatherBlack (talk) 19:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I also removed the Robert Ayers quotes (Robert Ayers, Robert Polidori, ARTINFO) as there was no longer a link. "Due to the nature of the modern camera lens, the analytical sense of his images comes from the pre-Renaissance and Renaissance perspectives. And: “When images are soft, they just remain evocative, or in your imagination. You get a mood, and it remains on the emotional level. The viewer has to put more of him or herself into it. When there is more detail, it’s like that old expression: There’s no fiction stranger than reality. Reality will compose the most extreme paradoxes and contradictions and adjacencies, which can’t be understood." HeatherBlack (talk) 20:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]