Talk:Robert Earl Hughes

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 March 2010. The result of the discussion was Snowball Keep.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

CrackArse .

http://www.washingtontimesreporter.com/state_news/x688587697 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.248.212.101 (talk) 23:14, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Buried in a piano case? yasssss

According to the Guinness Book of World Records, Robert Earl Hughes was buried in a coffin the size of a piano case, not in an actual piano case.97.73.64.150 (talk) 01:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to this source, that story is apocryphal.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.obituaries/c/HMFU69BSSQI?pli=1 Wikiwokowakawukuweke (talk) 15:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I read it, that group says the same as the article... that he was not buried in a piano case.Shajure (talk) 19:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UserEdit

User had added a gallery, which had spaced the page to be huge, I reverted it back to how it was from before. IamMoe79 (talk) 00:33, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Death

Article here: " On July 10, 1958, Hughes contracted a case of measles,[2] which soon developed into uremia,[2] resulting in his death in Bremen, Indiana". The article gives his death on the very same day. Was it really so - he died of complications of measles on the very day of the infection?!--Alexmagnus (talk) 12:56, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reworked the death section... I don't see a date for 1st symptoms.Shajure (talk) 21:18, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert Earl Hughes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120304152514/http://www.washingtontimesreporter.com/state_news/x688587697 to http://www.washingtontimesreporter.com/state_news/x688587697

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yahhoooo credibility

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Robert Earl Hughes's grave.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rampant Vandalism

It seems like this page has been a target of various vandals. Please on the lookout for them. BlacknoseDace (talk) 13:24, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are admins which are abusing their power

The final weight of Robert Earl Hughes was between 472kg (1041lbs) and 485kg (1069lbs and an admin with the username of BlacknoseDace Keeps on reverting this back to the incorrect weight of Hughes. I will be reporting this if it happens again.

I am not an admin. I am an autoconfirmed editor. This page is a frequent target of vandalism by IP editors, who usually mess with weights. The two weights show different sources, and the 485kg weight falls between the two. If you would like to, you may add a specification about the 485kg weight with a citation, but do not remove the 1071 pound estimate while there is a source attached. In addition to this, this is an article about an american person, and should have weights in pounds first, then kilograms. Regards, BlacknoseDace (talk) 18:26, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have studied the subject: Robert Earl Hughes for 2 years and I can confirm that 951lbs was one of the weigh ins however was definitely not his highest weight. You could put his weight as 200lbs and it will be true Because he surpassed that weight. however the specific reason his page was created because the public is interested in his peak weight of 1041lbs to 1069lbs mostly for the reason he had the ability to carry this weight. I will take his weight out of his introduction and find a way to add his weight back onto the quick facts.

The 1071lb claim was a result when a IP address vandal raised the weight to 8471lbs but was changed back by unsure people. I have not yet seen any 1071lb confirmation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.38.119.16 (talk) 14:05, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess the weight should be reported in the units used by the reliable source and converted using the "Convert" template. Otherwise other editors cannot confirm that the source and the text match. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk}

please change edited photo

Yes he was extreme large, however the photo currently being used is edited to make him look even more comically obese. Could someone please change it to a different photo, or the original unedited version of that photo. You can see the difference between in the images below. Edited photo currently being used https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ae/Robert_Earl_Hughes_Carnival.jpg The original unedited photo http://the-source.net/wp-content/uploads/1-28-523x514.jpg Just your average wikipedian (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a better photo that is legally available to WP, and that you have the rights to share, please upload it. The 2nd link perhaps does not work, as it shows on my browser only a portion of the image at the commons.Shajure (talk) 04:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes the comparison photo I used is cut off at the top and bottom, however it does show clearly that the photo currently being used has been stretched sideways to make the man look more spherical. I am not an expert on free use and copyright, but since the edited photo was able to be used without being taken down, I would assume that the image (both edited or unedited) is in free use? If so I would be happy to do some digging and find the uncropped unstretched image to replace the current one. Just your average wikipedian (talk) 05:33, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we can assume anything of the sort. It might well be appropriate to remove the current image.Shajure (talk) 10:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the link to the image.Shajure (talk) 10:55, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim about military service

The source is Ripley's Believe It Or Not, but there is no link.

The two obituaries I found do not mention military service: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.obituaries/c/HMFU69BSSQI?pli=1 https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/7051577/robert-earl-hughes

This article about him that doesn't mention military service: https://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/June-2001/Heavy/

Here is the likely explanation for the incorrect information: Robert had to register for the draft in 1944 but could not go to the registration office. They came to his home instead.

>That year, 1944, he had to register for the draft, but his parents told the draft board that they had no way of getting Robert Earl to registration in Mount Sterling, 12 miles away. So the draft board went to Fishhook to register him.

>Stories about the unusual draft accommodations made papers in Quincy and other nearby cities - the first time Robert Earl made headlines. The stories said Robert Earl, likely the largest man to ever register for the draft

https://www.oakridger.com/story/news/2008/03/13/world-s-heaviest-man-world/46240427007/

There is no evidence I could find beyond that of him actually serving, and that seems extremely unlikely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiwokowakawukuweke (talk • contribs) 16:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removed per wp:BLP Shajure (talk) 19:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Robert Earl Hughes, worlds largest man. Electrical engineer.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]