User talk:Just your average wikipedian
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Just your average wikipedian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Slowthin (talk) 09:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
The article Recursive islands and lakes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't appear to be a term in use or a noted phenomenon.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Recursive islands and lakes for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Recursive islands and lakes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recursive islands and lakes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 11:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Enjoy and welcome.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 09:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]Hi, thanks for noticing that thing about Vulcan Point no longer existing, I completely missed that.
Don't forget when adding content to Wikipedia articles to always cite sources. When copying content from related articles you can usually copy their citations along.
If you ever have any questions about editing, feel free to write on my talk page or come ask at the WP:Teahouse. See you around :) – Thjarkur (talk) 22:26, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Erdős–Bacon number, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 16:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi there, I do not see how it is possible to cite a source for the information I added, it is an undeniable fact that having a Bacon number of 1 and an Erdős number of 1 would give you an Erdős–Bacon number of 2, that is how the Erdős–Bacon number system works, I don't see why or even how a source can be cited for this. If you have any thoughts how we can get over this problem and keep this fact in the article, I would very much like to hear them as I think that Erdős–Bacon numbers 1 and 2 are important points to put in the article. Just your average wikipedian (talk) 01:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Your edit is factual, but it is not noteworthy. It's unnecessary commentary. If it's an undeniable (thus obvious) fact, it doesn't need to be stated in the first place. As an analogy, I could write a brief essay about how interesting it is that adding two and two produces the same result as multiplying two and two. I could even speculate (probably correctly) that no other number has such a quality. But that doesn't mean it belongs in a Wikipedia article. If you need a Wikipedia policy about the problem with your edit, it's your personal thoughts, which is original research, just as my personal thoughts about two and two is original research. Read WP:OR. At the very least including it requires a reliable source that discusses it. If it's important enough to include, then someone surely has discussed it in a reliable source. I suspect, however, that such a source does not exist, because (again) it is so obvious. But even finding a reliable source doesn't make it notable enough to include in the article. A reliable source is a requirement to include something in an article, but it is not sufficient. The information must be notable enough to include. In any event, although I appreciate your efforts, I disagree that it belongs in the article, so a consensus is needed to restore it.
- By the way, your edit includes one comment that, although perhaps true, is not undeniable: "Erdős–Bacon number 2 is the currently lowest achievable number, though no one to date has achieved it." Without a reliable source stating that, it is possible that someone has achieved it but no one has yet figured that out. Sundayclose (talk) 02:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Question about the Tathkyed Island
[edit]How was this island discovered and when? Are you the person who discovered it? Is there any way I can contact you off this platform for the sake of citing sources for journalism reporting purposes? Alan134 (talk) 20:03, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)