Talk:Robbie Baldwin

Comics: Marvel Mid‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This article may need general cleanup. Please see below for details.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[House of M (characters)#Wolfpack|Wolfpack]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Death of Speedball

I guess I'm willing to concede that with the information we have now, by my standards, it would be more direct to consider Speedball dead. But from the way the tv pundit is speaking, it's not so much of a verification of Speedball being dead as it is using him as an example since the New Warriors (in CW 1) are all presumed dead. However, we know one of them remains living, it could still be Speedball; there are also a lot of rumours pointing to him being alive, but I'm not going to go into them unless that's proved in the affirmitive. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 03:35, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more in favor of waiting for the end of the Civil War series before making any such decision. I'd need to see Reed Richards or Tony Stark actually say "Well, Speedball apparently tried to absorb the energy, but it was too much for him" and even then, well, I'd have my doubts. Kind of funny that X-factor this week had a character in denial about her own father's death, though. FrozenPurpleCube 05:45, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've got the feeling we're going to know pretty soon. As far as I can figure out, the only character who *must* die from this is Namorita, due to her proximity to the blast, but also, to secure the involvement of Namor. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 08:54, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, know we know. I have updated the page to reflect Civil War: Front Line #1. --Chancemichaels 20:21, 7 June 2006 (UTC)Chancemichaels[reply]

Was Speedball resistant to Telepathy?--Lord Zack 14:03, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the box about unreliable content due to upcoming titles, since it no longer applies.

SpeedBall-More like Bleedball, amiright?RoboChocobo 21:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Penance is a Skrull!

Bibliography

Don't give a shit whether or not anyone wants this here but still for those who actually like Speedball or end up wanting back issues of him... here y'all go.

Um...I never had anything against the character and after seeing how Frontline #2 ended I feel extremely sorry for the guy. It's stuff like that which makes me wonder whether heroes like Spider-Man would reconsider sending criminals to prison (as opposed to killing them) if they were aware of the conditions inside prisons and how, for many people, it's worse than death. Thinking about what those guys might do to Baldwin makes me feel sick. The only reason I didn't pick up the other six available issues of the series was because I decided to save my money until next week, and I'll be picking up issue #3 with dread.--Fingerknöchelkopf 22:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It helps to think of these stories as fiction. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 11:12, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliograpy

Alias #20-21
Alpha Flight vol. 1 #110
Amazing Spider-Man Annual #22, 26
Ant-Man's Big X-Mas
Avengers vol. 1 #332-333
Avengers vol. 3 #13
Captain America vol. 1 #352
Contest of Champions vol. 2 #1-5
Damage Control vol. 2 #2-4
Damage Control vol. 3 #1-2, 4
Fantastic Four vol. 1 #356, 367-368
Generation X #59
Hawkeye: Earth's Mightiest Marksman
I (heart) Marvel: Masked Intentions
Impossible Man Summer Vacation Spectacular #2
Infinity War #1-4
Iron Man vol. 1 #303
Iron Man vol. 3 #33
Marvel Comics Presents #14, 56, 85, 96, 122, 127
Marvel Super-Heroes vol. 3 #1-2, 4-6, 14
Moon Knight vol. 3 #41, 43-44
Namor vol. 1 #5
New Mutants Annual #7
New Warriors Annual #1-2
New Warriors vol. 1 #1-10, 14-17, 19-27, 29-30, 47-50, 70-75
New Warriors vol. 2 #0-10
New Warriors vol. 3 #1-6
Night Thrasher vol. 1 #2
Night Thrasher vol. 2 #11-12
Nova vol. 2 #6-7
Nova vol. 3 #1, 3, 5, 7
Spectacular Spider-Man Annual #12
Speedball #1-10
Thor vol. 1 #411-412
Thunderbolts #1, 8
Ultra-Girl #2-3
Uncanny X-Men Annual #15
Web of Spider-Man #75
Web of Spider-Man Annual #8
Wolverine vol. 2 #134, 149
Wonder Man vol. 2 #13
X-Factor Annual #6

As Masked Marvel

Speedball #1

Originalsinner 00:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Needs clearer picture

Needs clearer picture -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.13.181 (talk • contribs)

Reason for reversion

Hi, all. I left this posting at User talk:71.253.143.238, who began contributing Oct. 11, and at User talk:24.1.217.233, a longtime contributor.

Hi. I'm sorry for the reversion, but heavily detailed plot summaries are disallowed per Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Style guidance. To join discussion on related issues, you might like to contribute to Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#Plot summaries part 3 and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Wikipedia is not... plot summaries. Happy Wiki-ing! -- Tenebrae 22:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Ultimate Speedball

The "Other Versions" part of the article claims that Speedball made his debut in a cameo in Ultimate Spider-Man annual #2. This is not the case, it is merely a man dressed up in one of Speedball's costumes from the regular Marvel Universe in police custody saying "Not like this! Not like this!". This is the same as issue #81, which was released around the time of the House of M event, where a woman is dressed in Scarlet Witch's 616 costume, repeating "I'm not crazy!". It's merely Bendis referencing Marvel's big event at the time. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.29.195 (talk • contribs)

SHB image

Per WP:CMC/EG, SHB should be of most recognizable incarnation of the character. Robbie Baldwin is best known as Speedball, and not this new name and costume he has taken. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 10:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um to quote what i saw about the Superhero Box

"4. If the character has a clearly-defined primary costume (e.g. Superman), a picture of this should be used. Otherwise, the most recent ongoing costume of the character should be used."

Now i have seen speedball in different costumes, granted it is not as big of a change as Superman going to the electric blue uniform(i think that is what happened, it has been awhile) but it has still changed so wouldn't that mean that we use the most recent ongoing costume of the character .Phoenix741 19:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was supposed to be removed when the guideline was corrected previously to clearly say that we are to use the most recognizable image of the character. Robbie Baldwin is best known as Speedball and has been depicted this way for 20 years. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 13:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is he, however? I would argue that his current "Penance" guise (if it is indeed him, what I find weird somehow) is more recognizable at the moment than the Speedball version; after all, Speedball did not have a lot of appearances in the last few years, while Penance is something of a hot topic right now. While I find the Penance idea incredibly contrived and misconceived, it is still very visible now. Luis Dantas 13:13, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To argue that Robbie Baldwin is more recognizable is better recognized as Penance is laughable. Half of those who pick up T-Bolts #110 prolly don't know his true identity. As for Speedball "not have a lot of appearances in the last few years" let's not forget he starred in his own series, three subsequent Warriors series, and has had guest spots out the wazoo. I am excited he is finally growing as a character, and that Quesada didn't kill him, even if Norman Osborn may. User: Oshaberi

Cleanup

This article needs cleanup. Currently, it appears as if editors are just adding to the end of it without trying to make the whole thing work. The publication history covers ten issues of comics. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 11:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I started cleaning and editing this article. I'll try to add more and source a lot of it once I can track some more info down.Jvbishop 16:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article move

I think in light of the events in Civil War Fronlint #10, the page should be renamed to penance, because everyone is going to be wondering what penance's background is. i don't think the speedball identity is ever going to be seen again, but there are people going to be wondering who robbie was before penance. i didint really like the charchter of speedball, but penance is awsome! marvel will probably make penance the permanent charachter. i guess keeping the article name as robert baldwin would be ok. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chotterap (talk • contribs) 17:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I think we are going to keep it as Robert baldwin, if you type in speedball or penance it will link back to this, so i really see no problem.Phoenix741 20:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Shouldn't be a problem, as redirects are in place. --Mrph 23:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough. should the pic be updated? i was wondering because on the marvel universe, it is penance, not "robbie baldwin" or "speedball" that have an article. and the pic is also of penance. i think we should update that, and the powers and publication dates for the two identities. Chotterap 04:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See the SHB image discussion above. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 04:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article's Image

I think it should be changed or edited...the bottom of the thought bubble is too 'gauche'. And now I'm wondering why Steve Scott drew Robbie this way when on the covers of the New Warriors books he did, he had Robbie in an entirely new costume.

http://www.comicvine.com/comic/new-warriors/6787/&i=19013 -- Steve Scott stuff.

Lots42 19:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Universe

I'm sure I read somewhere that, when Marvel were creating the New Universe, they sent Tom DeFalco off to come up with all the character concepts for it and, when they checked on him months later, all he'd come up with was Speedball. He got booted off the project and the Speedball character got shunted into the main Marvel Universe - can anyone confirm this, or did I dream it.....? if true, I'd imageine it merits a mention here..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

D'oh, it would appear that the place where I read it was actually here! Just ignore me..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Penance...

I think - with his inclusion in Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2 - Penance is going to probably become more well known than his Speedball identity. Maybe we should swap the two images around and have the top one as Penance instead. MylesRW (talk) 13:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe you could use Avengers: The Initiative #29's cover which features both versions of Robbie Baldwin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.32.127 (talk) 01:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Robbie Baldwin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:20, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Robbie Baldwin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]