Talk:River Ouse, Sussex

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sussex Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name of river

I would be interested to see references for the assertions about the origin of the name Ouse and the previous name of Mid-wynd.QuestingVole 11:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have just found this [1] from The Sussex County Magazine, Volume 10, 1936. DuncanHill 23:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I found that but I'd like to know where they got their information from. QuestingVole 16:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm German and find the claim interesting that "Ouse" is supposed to be a "very common name for rivers in England". Does one other example suffice to support the assertion? Which are the other English rivers by the name of "Ouse"? I will not comment on the claim that the name is of celtic origin. Seems to me that certain people just love to see something celtic in just about everything. Is there an English term like "celtomania"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.236.137.36 (talk) 11:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Type "Ouse" into Wikipedia and it lists four. Bob1960evens (talk) 16:26, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Sussex Ouse Valley Way is a pretty thin article and, indeed, claims to follow the route of this river; in the absence of independently notable, or even interesting information, it would seem that the whole topic could be dealt with in this article. Rodhull andemu 23:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The way apparently does not follow the river exactly and is a separate entity, so is deserving of its own article. The point of stub articles (and red links) is to encourage readers to get involved and write the text, so I don't think they should be systematically merged or deleted for tidiness sake.--Charles (talk) 08:43, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Definitely a seperate entity which will ultimately be expanded and written about in a different way to the river. If it were merged, I'm sure it would reappear later. I have added it to the 'Hiking Project'. Derek Andrews (talk) 09:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looking at this further, the map[2] shows it deviates quite a bit from the course of the river. This is no towpath walk. Derek Andrews (talk) 20:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on River Ouse, Sussex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041206050201/http://sxouse.users.btopenworld.com:80/history.htm to http://sxouse.users.btopenworld.com/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Definition from The Free Dictionary Online

This mentions two rivers, neither of which is the Sussex Ouse. This source however claims that the name is derived from Lewes. Autarch (talk) 23:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative derivation added to article. Bob1960evens (talk) 13:37, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

I have checked the article against the criteria for B-class.

Suitably referenced, with inline citations
Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
Defined structure, with adequate lead
Reasonably well written for grammar and flow
Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images
Appropriately understandable

It currently fails on item 1, as much of the Ecology and wildlife section is unreferenced, and item 3, as the lead does not introduce the subject and summarise the main points of the article. I will leave it at C-class until these items are addressed. Bob1960evens (talk) 08:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All of the material is now referenced. Just the lead to do. Bob1960evens (talk) 16:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead now summarises the main points of article adequately, so I am rating it B-class. Bob1960evens (talk) 07:53, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

chemical status - question

Where do the polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE), perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) and mercury compounds come from?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3034:0:ADBE:1:2:DF3E:132E (talk) 16:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]