Talk:Ripley St Thomas Church of England Academy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ripley St Thomas Church of England Academy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

removal of non-encyclopedic material

I removed >>

- IN 2006 liz nicholls tookover the school after 12 Outstanding years under MR J Lailey who will be greatly missied. - - After many complaints the school (a high preformer , top 10% in the country) is said to have plundged into a great saidness and unhappiness(due to the lack of will from the new headmistress....the great efforts parents have gone to get there children in to Ripley has just become harder....this is believed to bw down to the headmistress...comments a mother, a former pupil of the school and who currently has one pupil in Yr8), exam results not at there best as of 2007 and no general signs of enjoyment in school.....one pupil comments"the atmosphere different here now.....there been to much change...not how we wanted it ... its seems sad really for such a great school....".

>> mainly because of the 'gushy' tone and poor spelling. There may be some relevant material here but it must be 'cited' so if a mother said this, then quote the article or report. Please read the Wikipedia policy of no original research

It is also possible to compose your contribution in a word processor (try OpenOffice) and spellcheck before cutting and pasting into the wikipedia editing box.

StaceyGrove 20:18, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very appropriate removal Stacey, however No Original Research doesn't exist. Strange that it's taken almost seven years for somebody to realise that! Byjinglemen (talk) 18:45, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copied text

I have deleted material copied verbatim from the school prospectus, the school webpage and a local newspaper article. Much of what is left copied from the school's History page, and needs rephrasing, preferably using an independent source. Kanguole (talk) 23:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleared. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 17:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://ripleystthomas.com/about/brief-history/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 17:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]