Talk:Right to the city

Urban studies and planning Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Squatting High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Expansion

I was wondering if there's anyone interested in adding to this article? From what I recall from my own reading of David Harvey's article, he emphasizes that this is a collective rather than individual human right. This is a significant point that I think could be mentioned in here. Is there anyone else out there with some ideas for improving this? Yaminator ^talk 23:12, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Yaminator: This article is too short. It doesn't even attempt to describe the key quality of Lefebvre's concept. Instead, there is too much written about a rather irrelevant remark of a not THAT important human geographer, a Marcelo Lopes de Souza. This statement has too much weight, it actually smells funny, biased even. While statements by theory-heavy weights like Peter Marcuse (From critical urban theory to the right to the city), Margit Meyer, Andreji Holm, Neil Brenner, to name just a few, are not even mentioned. As I am not a native speaker I'd rather not extend the article, however, I find the German page on the same issue a lot better: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recht_auf_Stadt --Sun Wukong (talk) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Sun_Wukong 00:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently writing an MSc dissertation using the Right to the City so I'll work on this page whenever I have time. Fivebeans (talk) 18:31, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

In particular the migrants and refugees section of the article, it seems to basically be presenting Lefebvre as the final word, which would be more fine if it was limited to the theory, but it's difficult to pick that apart. Most concerningly, part of that section is literally written as contention in the first person. I don't know enough about this field to rewrite, but I think it's needed. AllenY99 (talk) 06:40, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]