Jump to content

Talk:Ridable miniature railway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

[edit]

It looks a lot like we need to create a List of article. Comments? Rklawton 13:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I added a link on the great lakes live steamers I belive they run on 7 1/2 gague track if I am mistaken please correct it thanks Jeff.j 21:46, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


With the large number of listings of railways in the USA, wouldn't it make sense to have it's own list? "UK" and "Rest of the World" just doesn't seem right. Squirrelhollow 21:57 UTC June 19, 2007


it seems that alot of the places listed under uk railways dont have links to thier wikipedia pages, do they need to be put on or not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerlemurguy (talk • contribs) 15:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By all means link them, it's a basic requirement of Wikipedia to link articles where relevant. Mjroots (talk) 13:21, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added under 15inch (rest of the world) the Springbank Express in london ontario, i drive it. 23:03, 13 June 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.249.74.123 (talk)

Same thing

[edit]
  • Barking Park Miniature Railway, Barking, Essex (Now Closed).
    Being relaid in 7+1⁄4 in (184 mm) gauge, re-opening Easter 2009 [1].
  • Barking Park Light Railway: Re-opening Easter 2009 [1]
  1. ^ a b Barking Park Miniature Railway website Cite error: The named reference "barkingk" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).

Peter Horn User talk 02:21, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

[edit]

The title needs to be corrected to "Rideable". Tmangray (talk) 23:53, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Probably: rideable. Is ridable American English? The content of this article seems to be predominantly British, with the US definition in brackets in the lead. Therefore, it's probably worth adding {{British English}} to avoid future ambiguities. (And also move the article to Rideable miniature railway, with a redirect from the current spelling.) --Trevj (talk) 08:12, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, it should be "rideable". The current "ridable" is a recognised alternative spelling, but doesn't seem to make sense to me. I would have thought we should go with what Wiktionary says is the usual spelling. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 01:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I just went to consult the editor who originally named the article, but he has retired, and is no longer with us. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 02:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For what it is worth

[edit]

There is a miniature railway in some gardens on the seafront in (Thornton-)Cleveleys in Lancashire, although I do not know the gauge -- 62.25.109.196 (talk) 13:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Goffs Park Light Railway

[edit]

I'm not sure of the technicalities of this but perhaps an expert can decide -would this light railway in Goffs Park, Crawley, England count as a miniature railway? http://www.crawleymodelengineers.org.uk/index.html

Tafkam (talk) 17:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Forest Park Miniature Railroad, Ft. Worth, TX

[edit]

While a guage of 24 inches technically qualifies this miniature train as narrow guage, the locomotive and cars are today fanciful replicas, in earlier years more realistic, so its inclusion in this article would be appropriate.

http://www.fpmt.us/

--Janko (talk) 13:10, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sections "UK" and "rest of the world" different?

[edit]

To me it looks like they could be merged. Into single section per gauge, I mean. -DePiep (talk) 23:28, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://crowborough-mini-railway.vze.com/
    Triggered by \bvze\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:41, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sortable Table

[edit]

I've converted the existing list of railways to a single table as the increasingly cumbersome list feels that it's crying out for such a thing. I can see however that all might not approve. Here are my thoughts.

Pros

  • Can now sort entire list alphabetically
  • Can now sort by country to allow listing, for example, all railways in Australia
  • Consistency of format of name/location/reference/notes
  • More consistent with other 'lists of' pages

Cons

  • Makes editing a particular entry more cumbersome
  • Makes the page somewhat monolithic

Notes

  • Sorting by gauge doesn't work numerically. Someone with better wikitable knowledge than me could easily fix, I bet
  • Should the countries have the country string as well as the flagicon?
  • Some entries are in there twice/more as they have multiple gauges. Is there an easy solution via clever tabling?

The primary decision is whether to retain the 'by gauge' lists as well. I would say not given that the two lists will drift apart meaning the info is only in one or the other. I've left them there because others may prefer that list...

Smb1001 (talk) 13:32, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Having both the table and the list in this article is redundant and only one should be kept. Personally, I like the new, more-efficient table you made, so I'd say keep that one and delete the lists. I don't think it will happen, but hypothetically if someone liked the lists, they can always add them back using the edit history. Jackdude101 (Talk) 23:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of ridable miniature railways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michigan AuSable Valley Railroad

[edit]

Ongoing discussion FYI. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 03:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is now closed and the result was Keep. Jackdude101 talk cont 22:05, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

[edit]
Probably 15 in (381 mm) gauge

The Miniature Train at Monarch Park, Miniature Railway at Silver Lake and Midland Beach Railway Company should occasionally be added, please. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NearEMPTiness: Since the table in the article is sorted by track gauge, do you have that info available for the first two? If so, add that info to the articles and I will add them to the table. Jackdude101 talk cont 19:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jackdude101: I have searched for the gauge, but couldn't find it. I personally cannot guess it from the photos. Searching for the gauge of the Little General in Travel Town Museum might be the best option. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@NearEMPTiness: This isn't 100% definitive by any means, but according to Steamlocomotive.com, the only gauge noted for Armitage-Herschell locomotives at the turn of the century was 15 in (381 mm) gauge. Also, per the same website, Cagney, Armitage-Herschell's main competitor with park trains, made trains in 15 in (381 mm) gauge most often. Jackdude101 talk cont 01:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jackdude101: Thanks, this matches what we can see on the photo. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackdude101: Thank you for adding them to the list. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dampf-Bahn-Club Sprockhövel --NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Did you know ... that the Miniature Railway Company in 301 Broadway, New York, produced various types of diminutive railways which were in operation in many parks throughout the world around 1900? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikivoyage

[edit]

People interested in this article might be interested in the related travel guide at our sister project, which is voy:Miniatures, dioramas and scale models#Miniature railways and "Grand Scale" railroads. There is also a page at voy:Tourist trains. User:ShakespeareFan00 is trying to determine whether there is enough material to create a dedicated travel guide for rideable miniature railways. If you're interested in sharing your opinion (or helping out), see this discussion. If you'd like to know more about how Wikivoyage works, then voy:Wikivoyage:Welcome, Wikipedians explains some of the differences. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:22, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

[edit]

This is a list, shouln't it be "List of Ridable miniature railways" ? --Io Herodotus (talk) 02:45, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. Peter Horn User talk 15:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

6 1/4 inch gauge

[edit]

TomMort1 6+1⁄4 in gauge would be a new gauge (we have no article yet using this one). Is there a source proving that this size actually exists? If so, we can add it to the {{Track gauge}} list. .-DePiep (talk) 09:00, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DePiep 6+1⁄4 in gauge is quite rare. The only location I know of that has this gauge, is the Nelson Society of Modellers in New Zealand: https://www.nelsonmodellers.org.nz/about/history. Considering it's rarity, I suppose it it's really worth adding it to the {{Track gauge}} list. .-TomMort1 (talk) 10:49, 7 November 2018 (NZDT)
Not just "rare": unique indeed! This is the first instance we see in both en-wiki and de-wiki (German wiki, which hads a big list too). Your source proves it exists (it was defined). I will add it to the {{Track gauge}} (talk) "defined track gauges list"; your source is decisive. Could you add this source to the article? -DePiep (talk) 22:18, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
DePiep 6+1⁄4, cool thanks for that. I will add it to the sources as soon as I can .-TomMort1 (talk) 15:48, 7 November 2018 (NZDT)

What is really the minimum gauge

[edit]
A "High Line" representation of a Whitelegg designed Baltic Tank in LT&S Livery. This engine runs on a gauge of 3.5 inches known as Gauge III and is powerful enough to pull several people. High Lines are a configuration of a continuously elevated track and riders sit side-saddle or with legs straddling the track depending on lineside clearances.

What is really the minimum gauge that makes it ridable for an adult? would it be 5 in (127 mm)? Peter Horn User talk 00:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DePiep: I would appreciate your take on this. I would even take 7+1⁄4 in (184 mm) as the minimum ridable railway for an adult. Peter Horn User talk 15:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am not familiar with these railways. Browsing the table in Ridable miniature railway § Miniature railways (sorted), I found Barton House Railway having 3+1⁄2 in (89 mm), and a picture proving Adult Capacity :-) --- Oops, that's a 7 1/4 gauge. here their site shows the 3.5 in gauge. Maybe the sources also can clarify whether the track is used this way. (Personally, I will not make my HO-scale Märklin available for even child transportation!). -DePiep (talk) 16:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DePiep: I think I found the answer in Rail transport modelling scales#Scales. 5 in (127 mm) appears to be the minimum ridable and Ridable miniature railway should mention this. Peter Horn User talk 16:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, though the webside I linked to definitely states & shows that a 3.5-inch gauge does take passengers. That's a source then? -DePiep (talk) 16:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I reread that table carefully. It actually mentions 2+1⁄2 in (64 mm) as the minimum. Go figure. Peter Horn User talk 16:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DePiep: Hi, I just noticed that you forgot to "copy and paste" that link. I added a file from another article. Peter Horn User talk 21:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The link is there since 16:12. [1] -DePiep (talk) 21:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My expected a link to an outside source. My misunderstanding. Peter Horn User talk 22:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
With there being quite a few adult carrying 3.5 inch lines, I'm pretty sure that it counts. Wikipedia claiming otherwise would seem bizarre! Neith-Nabu (talk)


Italy

[edit]

I would like to suggest this track in north Italy for adding at the main page: https://parcoesposizioninovegro.it/altre-attivita-vapore-vivo/ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjEyPkw5OvCHn9veTijVNHA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.160.162.163 (talk) 17:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tunnel

[edit]
Henry's Tunnel

Willans Hill Miniature Railway in Wagga Wagga, layout viewable here at pin (A) has its own tunnel, which passes under Lord Baden Powell Drive, a public road. They make no special claims for it, but I suspect this may be unique. Any ideas? Doug butler (talk) 20:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New and dead railroads

[edit]

The Annetta Valley and Southern railway in the USA has shut down due to money issues. Theres a new one in the works, but its not ready yet. 2603:8080:F603:71B3:71C6:4E9F:DA3D:7EA2 (talk) 13:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ridable_miniature_railway&oldid=1205064565"