Talk:Richard Sharp Smith

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Richard Sharp Smith article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Richard Sharp Smith has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 10, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance).

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

GA Review

Passed. grungaloo (talk) 23:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Richard Sharp Smith/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grungaloo (talk · contribs) 03:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rublamb, I'm picking this one up too. I'll ping you once I've finished. grungaloo (talk) 03:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Rublamb, sorry it took me a minute to get to this. This article looks great, and I only have a few minor comments. Let me know when you're finished! grungaloo (talk) 16:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Grungaloo: I have made the updates you suggestions. Thanks so much for the tip on the inflation template. The editor that taught me about it (in anouther GA review) did not indicate the need for a closing date. I guess people assume it is self-updating. Thanks again for working on this and the other. You deserve more than one barnstar for this GA backlog blitz! Rublamb (talk) 21:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I really appreciate you saying that! The end_year isn't technically required, so the other GA reviewer didn't steer you wrong. Without it it will calculate to the last year it has data for (2023 I think), but personally I prefer having an end year so it's clear about when those numbers are from. Anyway, excellent work and congrats on another GA! grungaloo (talk) 23:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Refs 9,15,16,22,33,39,78 all good

Done He received additional architectural training in the office of a cousin, George Smith - Would swap around to say "office of George Smith, a cousin of his".
Done Smith ordered limestone from the Hallowell Stone Company of Bedford, Indiana, and cement from the J. B. Speed Company of Louisville, Kentucky, based on weekly usage, which he calculated based on the number of workmen and their skillset, the type of work being done, and the weather - A lot of commas make this a bit hard to follow. I would split the sentence in two, first describing who he ordered supplies from, and then how he did the calculation.
Done One of the most visible today - Most visible, does this mean most visited? Maybe say that, or "most prominent"? Comment: I could not find the concept of most visible, visited or prominent in the source, so made the sentence more general.
Done Olmsted and his wife are probably the most important guests who stayed in this brick and rough-cast house that no longer exists - This doesn't really match the source, it just says that the cottage was best-known for housing them. The way this sentence is worded implies others stayed at the house but they were less famous. Comment: good catch.
Done (equivalent to $311,698 in today's money - Needs a date instead of "today's money". Template:Inflation has an end_year parameter you can use.
Done In the fall of 1896, Smith established his private practice - Don't think "private" is needed, I don't think there are "public" practice architectural firms.
Done Sunnicrest is the only surviving cottage, but it has recently been restored by - Would replace "recently" with a date. Comment: I added a new source with a specific date.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Section layout is good. Prose is well written.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
Ref section exists, sources are reliable. Earwig flags a violation, but it's just picking up quotes which are appropriately quoted in the article. Use of sources is good and spot check is good.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Good coverage, nothing missing from what I can see. Good level of detail.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Meets NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No edit warring
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Images are good, appropriately licensed, captions are good too.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.