Jump to content

Talk:Rhythm Inside (Loïc Nottet song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rhythm Inside. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Rhythm Inside (Loïc Nottet song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 15:53, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will review. MWright96 (talk) 15:53, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

[edit]
  • "Previously, Nottet had participated in native singing competition The Voice Belgique in 2014" - in his
  • "for his Selfocracy Tour (2017-2018)." - en dash is needed in place of the hyphen

Background and composition

[edit]
  • "Belgian singer Loïc Nottet rose to fame after finishing second in native singing competition The Voice Belgique in 2014," - became prominent after finishing second in his native
  • "Another editor of Wiwibloggs pointed out" - mentioned

Critical reception and accolades

[edit]
  • "Music critics received "Rhythm Inside" with positive responses." - positively received "Rhythm Inside".

Music videos

[edit]
  • "although it had been since deleted." - has
  • "the clip was first broadcast on Belgian television La Une." - television channel
  • "According to Chris Haplin of Wiwibloggs, the clip "focuses on opposites and fighting conceptions, with shots including two young girls: one a beauty queen, the other playing with dinosaurs" - needs to be sourced
  • "the woman awakens again and proceeds into leaving the building." - to leave the building.
  • "she finds a clock on one tree" - on a tree

In Vienna

[edit]
  • "They occasionally perform choreography in form" - in the form
  • "Michael Cragg pointed out that Nottet" - drew attention
  • Italise The Guardian as it is a print publication

Points awarded to Belgium

[edit]
  • Remove the link to the word "Netherlands" since its already linked in the previous sub-section

References

[edit]
  • References 47 & 50 should be spelt as ESCToday like in ref 35
  • Remove eurovision.tv in Reference 49
  • The author is missing from references 10, 14, 48, 49, 51, 53 and 62

That's my lot. MWright96 (talk) 18:06, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: Thank you very much for reviewing the article! I have implemented all your suggestions, except there were no authors given in refs 48 and 62. Greetings ! ; Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:36, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]