Talk:Rho family of GTPases

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is within the scope of the Cell Signaling task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Rho family of GTPases is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

There's a problem with the first paragraph, "The members of the Rho GTPase family have been shown to regulate many aspects of intracellular actin dynamics, and are found in all eukaryotic organisms as well as in yeasts and some plants."

Yeast and Plants are eukaryotes.

I changed it to "found in all eukaryotic kingdoms", which I imagine is what was meant.

Gould363 (talk) 04:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I quote: Wrch1 (RhoV), Chp/Wrch2 (RhoU) from this web page is incorrect.

Corrected below.

Wrch1 = RhoU

Chp/Wrch2 = RhoV —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.216.249.75 (talk) 10:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to have already been corrected in the article.

Gould363 (talk) 04:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the part about GEF. It was all wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaipablo (talk • contribs) 21:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nervous System Regeneration: Incorrectly quotes reference 14.

Should read, 'Neurons growing in culture increase in their ability to cross over inhibitory CSPG lanes after administration of constitutively-active Cdc42 and Rac1, and C3 transferase, an inhibitor of rho activation and its downstream effector, ROCK.'165.230.31.178 (talk) 16:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the C3 transferase result is tangential & would require too much explaining to be worth including here. Similarly, I don't think Rock needs to be included -- it has been mentioned elsewhere as a downstream effector & is not a major thrust of the paper cited. I did not see anything about dom neg RhoA in the abstract/1st page of the cited work (don't have access to the full text), but I don't have any reason per se to believe it is wrong. For now, I have moved the ref no to follow the constitutive results & added a Citation Needed flag to the dom neg result. Gould363 (talk) 04:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

5.1 and below

Sections 5.1 and below needs links. Too many unlinked terms Mikecf10 (talk) 22:10, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added some links. Needs more work ...

Gould363 (talk) 04:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]