Jump to content

Talk:Revival Vintage Bottle Shop

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Categories

[edit]

I have no clue where this should be categorized. Valereee (talk) 21:51, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk13:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Valereee (talk). Self-nominated at 14:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Revival Vintage Bottle Shop; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Hook needs work Evrik 14:08, July 3, 2023

New reviewer needed. Valereee (talk) 18:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that @Valereee: has asked for a new reviewer because I worked on the hooks. --evrik (talk) 00:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Much of this article is devoted to the unique regulatory arrangement responsible for the store's existence. Some sources are very thin on details regarding the shop, providing only surface-level details. Some of the sources also come across as regular and unsustained news coverage, leading me to wonder if the subject meets the notability standards. Another source had to be removed per WP:FORBESCON. I think the article requires a rework that demonstrates it meets the notability requirements with WP:NOTNEWS in mind. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:13, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So, for me, what got it over the hump (I'd held off for a couple years waiting for sources) was the NYT, Tasting Table and Honolulu Star pieces. The Honolulu Star and Tasting Table are a bit short, but the NYT is definitely sigcove. The rest are local but sigcov. What was your concern, Pbritti?
Whoops, forgot to sign: fixing ping: Pbritti. Valereee (talk) 11:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think the article could do with a bit more expansions specifically on the shop, but that's not a matter for DYK. Got access to the NYT source and I agree that it provides SIGCOV that, when coupled with coverage in Vinepair, more than amounts to greater than local-interest news coverage. I prefer hook ALT0. Might end up making an article on the relevant legislation; it's very interesting. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pbritti, thanks for the review! I agree on the law, I'm actually surprised we don't have an article, it's definitely received sigcov in RS. Valereee (talk) 16:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note to promoter: September 1st is the start of National Bourbon Month in the US, would love to have this scheduled for then! Valereee (talk) 16:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note to promoter: It's possible this very short article (lacking an explanation of why dusties are illegal at all given the minimal possibility of contamination issues) does not meet length requirement since parts were apparently copied wholesale from Vintage spirits. — LlywelynII 15:19, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weird favor

[edit]

Weird favor: If there's anything in this shop that accurately represents "Robertson County-style Tennessee whiskey" a photo of a bottle would be a benefit to Andrew Johnson alcoholism debate. TY! jengod (talk) 20:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see if I can't get down to the store and ask the proprietor about it! Valereee (talk) 12:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]