Talk:Retrotronics

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 February 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Popular culture (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture articles

Origins

See Talk:Steampunk#Retrotronics Andy Dingley (talk) 13:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

tag removal

I removed the speedy delete tag per the following already posted reasons, which I am copying and pasting in here so they can be seen more readily (now that I have deleted the tag).--Epeefleche (talk) 20:14, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale

Please see talk:Retrotronics#Origins and talk:Steampunk#Retrotronics for an explanation of the origins of this page - a brief stub creation so that an anon IP can proceed to flesh it out.

As for {{db-corp}}, then which "company, corporation, organization, or group" are we talking about here? It's simply an inappropriate criterion.

For an accusation of commercial spam, just which of the four independent links (none of which are overly promoted here) is accused of spamming?

KEEP I agree with Andy. This is a description of an activity, whcih could not even be called a "movement". It is certainly unorganized, so that {{db-corp}} has no applicability. The article is certainly a little thin at the moment, but that will change with time.. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 14:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP Playing with Nixie and other vacuum tubes is entirely retro and lots of cool stuff along these lines can be found via Make and many other sources. Deleting this entry seems very reactionary. (User talk:kah13) —Preceding undated comment added 05:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Should this article exist, or exist under this name?

This article appears it may violate Wikipedia's WP:NONEO policy. Beyond being a neologism, none of the article's secondary sources appear to even refer to "retrotronics" in passing. Can anyone supply reliable sources which refer to retrotronics? --Ds13 (talk) 00:00, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]