Talk:Respirocyte

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 March 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of cells.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

included direct quote from relevant articles, and added an internal link to transhumanism's wiki--Loganis 20:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

If these are just hypothetical, are they really notable enough? It doesn't seem like respirocytes receive much mention in independent sources outside this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dakane2 (talk • contribs) 03:34, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just added a reference from a journal, in case it might be of use. Talgalili (talk) 19:37, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They are referenced both in the scientific, bioethical, sf literature, and a few games. They are probably the neatest example of a theoretical nanomachine design that can be worked out in high detail and would be useful if it could be built. Anders Sandberg (talk) 17:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the refs in question? - David Gerard (talk) 19:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Curtailing the spread of misinformation

A popular misunderstanding about lactic acid is repeated in the article. A better explanation of the reason for muscle fatigue can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactic_acid#Exercise_and_lactate (essentially, it relates not to lactic acid build-up, but to ATP consumption outstripping creation/supply). I don't presently have the gumption to fix it myself, but I'm sure someone else will be eventually see this and feel the urge to do it. ... Ah screw it, I'll do it myself. It's basically amounts to removing the reference to lactic acid build-up.

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Osiris (talk) 07:24, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Content was copied through very close paraphrasing from the following websites:

Osiris (talk) 07:24, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability - merge somewhere?

I've asked for a few years for decent sourcing, and am concluding it either doesn't exist or zero editors can be bothered. Merge and redirect to the Freitas article? - David Gerard (talk) 13:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

respirocytes currently in testing

my Google fu is failing me though. i can't find the citation. Nicholasjh1 (talk) 20:26, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These 2 articles mention respirocytes among other technologies being pursued. https://www.businessinsider.com/8-technologies-the-pentagon-pursuing-create-super-soldiers-2017-7 https://nypost.com/2020/12/19/france-china-developing-biologically-engineered-super-soldiers/ Jordan Jaxs (talk) 07:24, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]