User talk:Dakane2

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

The infobox on the article isotopes of plutonium contains blatant vandalism. However, I can't see where one would go to edit it. Could someone point me in the right direction?

Hi Dakane2 thanks for pointing that out, the vandalism was actually to Template:Infobox plutonium isotopes now reverted and editor warned. Thanks KylieTastic (talk) 21:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fake middle name

Hey Dakane2, thanks for catching the vandalism on Roslyn Lindheim today. I didn't look beyond correcting the capitalization, so good that you were there.Augusthorsesdroppings10 (talk) 21:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Nicholas Scott

Thanks for looking out for the Nicholas Scott article but I did not remove anything. If anything, I added information (full name of primary school). Rewording is not removing.

Yours. 107.127.46.21 (talk) 20:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I misread that. Dakane2 (talk) 20:29, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The edit to the Omani/UAE relations page was not a test. How can a country "seem" to border on the Gulf of Oman? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.142.33.203 (talk) 19:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, so I thought maybe it was a test or mistake since the grammar tag was in the middle of a paragraph. The grammar was correct although I totally agree it doesn't make sense to say a country seems to border something instead of saying it actually does, so I changed it. Feel free to simply fix things like that. Dakane2 (talk) 19:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ONUS

Explanation? Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 20:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit because it looked to me like talking in an article but undid my reversion after seeing that you weren't a new user and added a note here Talk:Knob_Noster,_Missouri. Dakane2 (talk) 20:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talking in an article? I'm a pending changes reviewer. I reviewed a new addition to the article that was unsourced and reverted it for that reason and that reason only. That's all. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 20:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OLDCC

Hi Dakane2 thanks for your comments about editing the page. I'm new to editing Wikipedia, but am authorized by the Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation (OLDCC) to make changes and updates to their page to reflect the updates to the Office. Thank you! Writereditor72 (talk) 21:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Writereditor72, sorry to undo your edits when you were not doing anything malicious. The problem is, a lot of vandalism consists of removing content without a good reason. If you use an explanatory edit summary when doing so you shouldn't have trouble with that. That said, it sounds like you might possibly have a conflict of interest so you should make yourself familiar with Wikipedia's policies on that.Dakane2 (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize - I really appreciate the feedback and guidance. Writereditor72 (talk) 17:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Olekina Ledama & 105.163.158.75: Legal threat. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Cullen328 (talk) 21:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, UARC Research Institute Of Tactical Autonomy Web URL Change

We are updating our website URL to the URL managed by Howard University. RITA.TEAM is out of compliance and is not the official URL of the RITA UARC.

I am the Digital Comm Manager for the RITA UARC 205.209.26.202 (talk) 18:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for reverting your edit. Feel free to update the URL. In your edit, there wasn't an edit summary so I did't realize there was a good reason for it. Dakane2 (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]