Talk:Republican Party of Virginia

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Virginia Mid‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American / Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

It is obvious this was written by a non-Republican person(s). Should not show your true colors in what is suppose to be an unbiased description and/or explanation of actions by other persons. I object to word use in what appears to be statements, but are in fact ones own beliefs, author. Thus, I strongly agree with the 1st comment below on Policy positions. Furthermore, I agree w Quackslikeaduck input on the need to state 'policy' only, as apposed to listing individuals. ~~ [User:MiMi] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.211.165 (talk) 17:56, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the best job I could to summarize and update the current events section, a section which I did not start. StevenL, who added the NPOV tag, did not state his objections. I see that he is a Ron Paul supporter and perhaps feels that the Virginia Republican party is not giving Ron Paul sufficient attention. For a more complete picture, I added a sentence and reference to the party leaders' proposal to moderate the abusive driver fees. Racepacket 13:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- This was so long ago, I forgot what my objections were. I actually don't have any major objections to what goes on at 115 E Grace Street, although I do support Ron Paul. --StevenL (talk) 22:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I made edits mainly grammatical such as referring to stuff in January 2009 as being in the future... which is kinda hard considering we are in march 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Salestron (talk • contribs) 04:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Policy positions

The "Policy positions" section includes positions of the Virginia Republican Party as well as bills supported by members of the elected legislature. Because this article is about the Virginia Republican Party itself, rather than politicians who caucus with other Republicans, I feel that this section should only include official policy positions of the Virginia Republican Party. Thoughts? ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 14:50, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The "policy positions" section doesn't have anything to do with RPV at all, but are biased complaints about individuals. It should be removed. 74.79.142.29 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:30, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Republican Party of Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090312071322/http://www.rpv.org:80/candidates/ to http://www.rpv.org/candidates/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Republican Party of Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081029031831/http://www.williamjhowell.org/files/20080312%20-%20Speaker%20News%20Release%20-%20Howell%20Statement%20on%20Budget%20Agreement.doc to http://www.williamjhowell.org/files/20080312%20-%20Speaker%20News%20Release%20-%20Howell%20Statement%20on%20Budget%20Agreement.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Republican Party of Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the Confederate statutes, says John Whitbeck

On Aug 14, 2017; John Whitbeck told CNN Wolf Blitzer that in the aftermath of the Charlotte incident that the confederate statutes should not come down. Needs to be readily apparent in the article as the platform of the Virginia Republicans. --Wikipietime (talk) 18:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]