Talk:RenewableUK

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment: Sustainability Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sustainability task force.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

proposed page move to RenewableUK

Given that the association is now called RenewableUK, I propose moving the page to that.

Based on the Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(trademarks), I propose applying the guidance on CamelCase in Trademarks, to keep the capitalisation as RenewableUK, in the interests of legibility: renewableuk is hard to parse, compared to RenewableUK.

Ernestfax^Talk 13:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

move done, nem con Ernestfax^Talk 23:15, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]