Talk:Remembrance Project

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History should cover SPLC's Characterization, additional details from Politico piece

User:Pnoza had reverted the section containing the admittedly sharp characterization of the group by the SPLC. Given that most mainstream coverage of the group (LA times and Politico) had included references to this description, it is due in the article. Politico also offers analysis that is somewhat critical of Espinoza and suggests much of the activism was tied to political ambition and suggests mishandling of funds. I haven't searched for other sources reporting the same, but there's probably more here that should also be added to the article. 24.96.130.81 (talk) 01:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pnoza, please don't edit other's comments on talk pages. This is a place to collaborate directly. Also, your comment reaffirms the need for you to review WP:COI. 24.96.130.81 (talk) 01:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SD is behind the negative edits about this organizations. She has been trying to smear & slander the organization for almost a year. The edits made by "Anonymous with IP address 24.96.130.81 should not be added due to a personal agenda. Unsigned comment added by Pnoza (talk)

I'm not sure where any of either of your info is coming from but when looking at all of the sites where "anonymous" is getting their info none are actual facts. They're all OPINIONS and have not been proven. Therefore, they should not be put on wikipedia as facts. Maybe "anonymous" should read the rules of wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TXWhistleBlower (talk • contribs) 01:30, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair warning: admins can use CheckUser to see if you are using closely related accounts to abusively edit. If this happens to be the case, you may be indefinitely blocked from editing for doing so. I'll also ask you one more time to review WP:COI. After this, I will have to report it to the appropriate noticeboard if your edits still seem to be in violation. 24.96.130.81 (talk) 01:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SPLC is a hate group

Why is the SPLC quoted in this article? The SPLC is a known hate group that is anti-American and anti-White, which has been successfully sued for defamation and had judgements against it (i.e., the SPLC lost the defamation suit). The SPLC is not an acceptable or reliable academic source for Wikipedia and it would be an embarrassment to the whole Wikipedia community to cite the SPLC;s biased views in any article.Starhistory22 (talk) 16:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're free to take any concerns you might have about the SPLC to RSN. 24.96.130.81 (talk) 17:18, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]