Talk:Religious clothing

Religion High‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[wedding ring#religion|wedding rings]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Areas for expansion

I'm not terribly au fait with this topic, but there's a lot of scope for expansion, and considerable WP:UNDUE in giving such space to a niche item like the Peace Mala bracelet while omitting the Five Ks of Sikhism, the saffron robes of Theravada Buddhist monks and the maroon robes of those of the Vajrayana tradition, the Jewish Tallit and Kippah, the hat wearing of Haredi Judaism, Latter Day Saint Temple garment, Masonic aprons, etc etc. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 12:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of "Right to Clothing"

I've added a link in the 'See Also' section on the right to clothing - the page does not exist yet - it's in my sandbox and will be uploaded once it has been finished. Cheers. Nickkokay (talk) 12:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Burke-Galero.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 19:06, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://symbolsage.com/white-wedding-gown-dress/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 03:38, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Series on Western clothing?

Having the sidebar titled "Part of a series on Western dress codes" at the top of this article does not seem particularly fitting, given that the article's scope is presumably clothing in all religions, including non-Western ones. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 00:39, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This seems strange. What would be more fitting ;) ?

~~~ MestizaMetaphor (talk) 03:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]