Talk:Reliability verification
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | The contents of the Reliability verification page were merged into Reliability engineering#Reliability testing on 19 November 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: You may want to integrate content from Reliability engineering into this article, and/or rewrite content at Reliability engineering based on your research..
signed, Rosguill talk 20:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Picking up on that point, the term 'reliability testing', which is mentioned at the start of the lede as a synonym of 'reliability verification', currently redirects to that 'reliability engineering' article. IMO it would make more sense to change the redir to this article. But before doing that, I wanted to ask (informally, rather than opening an actual merge etc. discussion) if that's the best approach, or whether the contents of this article should be incorporate into 'reliability engineering' (with redir from here, obvs). Views? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:39, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- I think that from a strict notability perspective it's possible to keep the two articles separate, especially if the relevant section at the broader engineering article is linked to here with a {{main}} tag. That having been said, this doesn't mean that we can't merge the articles if people think that that would be a better way of representing the information, and I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other. signed, Rosguill talk 19:19, 12 December 2020 (UTC)