Talk:Relations between early Christianity and Judaism

This article has been merged into History of early Christianity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vassyana (talk • contribs) 15:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THE Jews

Is it just me or does saying "THE Jews" seem kind of unnecessary? I know it was used in existing articles and not implemented by this one or its creator (Richard), but just saying "Jews" in all such articles seems more appropriate since obviously not every single Jew on the planet is alleged to be involved in topics at hand, only certain of them. If everyone agrees I'll change it. -Bikinibomb (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Persecution of early Christians by the Jews

I'm not sure if making this article was the wisest decision. See the discussion that inspired it over at Talk:Persecution of early Christians by the Jews - CheshireKatz (talk) 19:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect?

Shouldn't this be redirected to Split of early Christianity and Judaism instead? 75.15.194.133 (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 9 February 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

At Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Relations between early Christianity and Judaism, I've kindly requested unprotection or, looking at both the edit history and the topical nature of the redirect, consideration to a downgrading in indefinite protection implemented by Vassyana, who was administratively desysopped due to inactivity, many years ago to, perhaps, WP:AUTOCONFIRMED or WP:ECP. If an administrator could consider that request, particularly as Vassyana is only semi-active on Wikipedia, that would be great.

Failing that, if an administrator could kindly retarget the redirect to fix the double redirect, that'd be great. --Doug Mehus T·C 00:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC) Doug Mehus T·C 00:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I noticed that the History of early Christianity to which this redirect redirects in the double-redirect is not fully protected (it's not protected at all), neither is the end article page Early Christianity. Given that there has been no vandalism to that redirect, I'm inclined to think WP:AUTOCONFIRMED, at most WP:ECP, protection should be sufficient for both the history merge redirects. I'll update the WP:RfPP request. --Doug Mehus T·C 01:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the double redirect. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]