User talk:CheshireKatz

Thank you for your help

I wish to thank you for your help on the Thermal death time. It earned a DYK yesterday. I really appreciate it. Chris 14:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Arabism

Resolved

– Compromise achieved and edit war ceased - CheshireKatz (talk) 17:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you made a large, contentious change to this article without an informative edit summary and without discussing it. Could you please join the discussion on the talk page to explain your changes? Amaliq (talk) 02:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page updated. - CheshireKatz (talk)

Thanks for your note. Regarding the Anti-Arabism article, I'm not really familiar with the current contents or disputes. I'll monitor it administratively to ensure, for example, that banned editors don't continue to edit there, and I'll try to keep an eye if edit wars break out, but other than that I'd prefer not to get involved. I'm sorry I can't be of more help. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your understanding. I noticed you've been adding references sourced to "The Jewish News Weekly of Northern California". In reality, that's j. - you might want to add the proper link to the references. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Paul Blimp

Resolved

– Content relocated to Ron Paul presidential campaign developments, 2008 - CheshireKatz (talk) 17:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes that information is on the Ron Paul Revolution page but currently that page is up for deleation, as well the $200,000 dollars from supporters goes nicely between campain finance and the moneybomb section. So I am putting it back. If the Ron Paul Revolution page stays it may be OK to delete it, then. Thanks,--Duchamps comb (talk) 19:51, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for the heads up. I hadn't noticed that. In that case I don't see a problem with resigning it to the Ron Paul presidential campaign, 2008 page until the deletion debate has been resolved. I wouldn't consider its acquisition particularly significant to his career as a whole, but definitely noteworthy in respect to his campaign. The goal as I mentioned on the talk page is to compress the section down to a few paragraphs. - CheshireKatz (talk) 19:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Paul Revolution

Resolved

– Article deleted. - CheshireKatz (talk) 21:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Articles for deletion/Ron Paul Revolution

If you have time I would like to hear your comments on this page. Thank you.--Duchamps comb (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abe Foxman

Resolved

– Neutral wording selected. - CheshireKatz (talk) 18:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CheshireKatz-

I disagree with your reversion of my edit on the page re: Abe Foxman (I have no idea how to link stuff--sorry.)

What about using "killed" in place of murdered? That may satisfy everyone.

--Nyarf (talk) 01:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Thanks. --Nyarf (talk) 03:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming an article

Resolved

– Article moved. - CheshireKatz (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I love your nick and I like your idea of renaming Persecution of early Christians by the Jews into Depictions of Jews persecuting Christians in the New Testament. Let's file WP:RM. Please LMK if you need help. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 22:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks any help will be appreciated. Also take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical persecution by Jews (2nd nomination). :D - CheshireKatz (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming article

Resolved

– Article moved. - CheshireKatz (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Cheshire. I wanted to share some thoughts with you on how to gain consensus on renaming the article Persecution of early Christians by the Jews‎. Perhaps you and I can agree upon a short list of two or three good alternatives and then work with editors such as Richard in order to form consensus.

Let me know if you're interested -- you can post your reply here so we can keep the discussion on one page. Cheers, Majoreditor (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that sounds great. I reevaluated my move request after thinking about Richard's argument against my initial proposal. The article arose when the Early Christian Persecution section of Persecution of Christians (primarily covering alleged acts by Romans & Israelites in the NT) got too unmanageable. The editors opted to resolve this by splitting the section into two subpages based upon the persecutors, Persecution of early Christians by the Jews & Persecution of early Christians by the Romans.

I think that's where the initial problem occurred. Instead of dividing the section based upon the alleged persecutors, it probably ought to have been divided based upon something less controversial, such as the sources. The Persecution of early Christians by the Romans is now largely a well-sourced historical account of the history of Christian treatment within the Roman Empire with only a handful of items sourced from Christian texts. By contrast the Persecution of early Christians by the Jews is almost entirely sourced in Christian texts and includes few reliable, published secondary sources other than those that deal with the historicity of Christian texts. This is why I think the articles can be nicely parsed into Early Christian persecution in the Roman Empire and Early Christian persecution in the New Testament, since they cover overlapping eras, but contain very different depictions.

Do you have alternative suggestion on wording and/or division of article content? I have to say that conversation has substantially died down since the move request was revised and, despite The Evil Spartan's revert (which I suspect might've been a bit reactionary), no opposition has been voiced, which I'm still tempted to interpret as silent acquiescence. - CheshireKatz (talk) 20:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm formulating some alternatives for article wording and will think about content division/combination possibilities. I'm optimistic we can come up with something that will work. I've got some off-wiki commitments tomorrow but will serve them up to you this weekend so we can bounce around ideas. Cheers, Majoreditor (talk) 02:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Looks as if you and Richard have worked through the issues and hammered together a proposal. That's great; I think we can use it to reach consensus. Majoreditor (talk) 06:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Christian companies

Resolved

– Weighed in on discussion. - CheshireKatz (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CheshireKatz - In November you pointed out need for a cope note on Category:Christian companies, and I just proposed that we rename it to make your point explicit. Your comments and suggestions on the CFD (1/8) would be welcome. --Lquilter (talk) 01:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Arabism

Resolved

– Compromise achieved and edit war ceased. - CheshireKatz (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your rv on the Talk page. - CheshireKatz (talk) 23:05, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It already is on the talk page. // Liftarn (talk)

O HAI THARZ

i'm in your wikipedia, stealin' your bukket! - Sarystarlight (talk) 02:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter

This newsletter was automatically delivered by ShepBot because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) on 04:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 02:24, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Judaism Newsletter

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, ~~barnstars~~, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique[approves|this|message] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:03, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

amazing

Hi, I'm a rising 3L in New York, I stumbled upon your userpages doing a "what links here" from a case I'm creating. It looks really cool. Are you using your userpages to take notes?

My study group is using userpages to post casebook tables of contents -- see User:JD Caselaw. I'm trying to get my friends to put all their tables of contents up in this fashion, and I'm also starting a "Student written hornbook" club, which will create userpages dedicated to individual classes, with hyperlinks to the corresponding articles on wikipedia. Each userpage will be a hornbook. Thoughts? Agradman ^{appreciates civility}/_{makes occasional mistakes} 02:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sapiosexual

As an editor to this page, you may be interested to know I have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at WP:Articles for deletion/Sapiosexual (3rd nomination). Robofish (talk) 00:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Azzarellosjoker.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Azzarellosjoker.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]