Talk:Recruitment in the British Army

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[British Empire#End of British Raj|Independence]] The anchor (#End of British Raj) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Military history: British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

United Kingdom High‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Northern Ireland Mid‑importance

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I did not concern myself with historical facts or data; only on redundant contents and re-writing as neccessary. Babyrina2 06:47, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

I have assessed this article as start per the Milhist criteria. This was primarily due to its lack of inline citations, see Wikipedia:Citing sources. We can't have bare external links in the text. I also think it can be expanded a lot in places, particularly WWII and WWI. I think you need to move the text in the National service article into a new article: Recruitment into the British Army during World War Two. That article should be developed and then summarised using summary style. If you have any questions, my talkpage is always open. Woody (talk) 14:20, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current debate on whether to cap numbers of recruits from Commonwealth countries should also be added, also refer to specific exceptions to recruiting in the UK such as Gurkhas, I believe that there's a reasonable number of Fijians currently in teh Army too. David Underdown (talk) 15:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedits, hanging sentences etc

HLGallen, as per your message on my talk page, from what I’ve seen of your edits (I’ve only looked at the first section concerning the 18th Century), the edits look positive and improve the article. I would have still liked to have kept part of the last line concerning troop levels in 1793. ``The Army was neglected as never before and total strength in 1793 stood at 40,000. `` As for the sources, please go-ahead and change to book and real publisher, as long as we don’t lose the inline citations. --Rockybiggs (talk) 12:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the requested text. HLGallon (talk) 20:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you--Rockybiggs (talk) 20:38, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Present Commonwealth & foreign recruitment

The Ministry of Defence now caps the number of recruits from Commonwealth countries at 10% of any corps or regiment in the Army, although this will not affect the Gurkhas. If the trend continues 10% of the army will be from Commonwealth countries before 2012. The cap is still debated, as some fear the army's "Britishness" is being diluted, and employing too many could make the army seen as employing too many mercenaries

the section above suggests that such a cap has been implemented yet the article cited only states that the MoD has only discussed it, not implemented it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.182.99 (talk) 22:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i am a nigerian presently in nigeria and i am interested in the present commonwealth& foriegn recruitment i want to know the requirements and also how to go about that. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yakunat (talk • contribs) 07:31, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

No mention of African Slaves being purchased for West Indies regiments. Al Cook USA

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Recruitment in the British Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Current recruitment

The section 'From National Service to all-professional army' could use more inline references, but my main concern is that it gives no indication of the present (as of October 2018) army recruitment crisis since the process was outsourced to Capita, as discussed by the Commons Defence Select Committee. JezGrove (talk) 19:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

'Contemptible Little Army'

First World War section: 'It was abundantly clear that the army that the Kaiser had referred to as a "contemptible little army" would need thousands more recruits.' But: 'The Kaiser it was said, had referred to the British troops as "a contemptible little army". It is now known that the phrase emanated not from the German side, but from the closets of British propagandists who needed something memorable and incisive to inspire the troops. The phrase was actually devised at the War Office by Sir Frederick Maurice and fathered upon the Kaiser.' Pg 116, The Great War and Modern Memory, Paul Fussell, Oxford University Press, Inc. 1975, 2000. Robert P Connolly (talk) 13:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]