Talk:Records in Contexts

I hope the changes made satisfy the requirements for notability. If not, please let me know more specifically what I can further do to improve it. RiC is mentioned in various journal articles relating to records management and archival science, and I'm sure will be more over the coming year or so, but I do not know how best to include these in the article or whether they can simply be listed in the references.

I know the article still needs a fair bit of work, especially with regards to the "Ontology" aspect of RiC which I do not feel confident explaining. I also hope the "Response" section can be made to better reflect the mix of opinion that RiC has received, as in its current state it appears fairly negative - which obviously would be fine if this was an accurate reflection of general opinion, but I do not feel it is. There have been several blog posts by records professionals that express support for RiC, but I am unsure as to how best to include these. I will come back to this and attempt to remedy this, but hope others will contribute as well. --Robrob42 (talk) 01:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)