Talk:Reasonable Faith (book)

Philosophy: Literature / Religion / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Philosophy of religion
	Contemporary philosophy

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I am still working on the page and I promise that I will change all I need to change in order for it to not be a copyright infringement. Please just let me edit the page, and I'm only starting to learn how to use Wikipedia. Thank you. --Vanguard Scholar (talk) 18:58, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is two things you need to do. First, you only need to quote from one or two reviews at most, and keep the quotes shorter. Secondly -- nearly all of the introductory paragraph is a copy from several online descriptions of the book, including the one at Craig's Reasonable Faith website. We can't have that here -- it's a copyright violation. Talk about the book in your own sentences. Keep it neutral.
I would suggest to the reviewing administrator that this article be userfied for Vanguard Scholar to work on it outside mainspace until it is ready. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 19:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I am still developing the page and I promise that I will change everything that currently makes this page an infringement. --Vanguard Scholar (talk) 19:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've revised the summary of the book and hope that it now does not pose an infringement. Also, I revised the book reviews now. I wish to add more to the page soon and this will be original content--not copied. Thanks. :) Vanguard Scholar (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]