Jump to content

Talk:Reanne Evans

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]
Resolved
 – WP:NOTFORUM.

World Ladies UK Championship? Who enters that? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MartinUK (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Wrong ranking

[edit]
Resolved
 – Information not in the article anymore and PIOS is defunct. Armbrust Talk Contribs 03:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it wrong to write that Reanne Evans is ranked 71 in the world when in fact she is ranked 71 below the 96 players in the main tour? She should thus be ranked 96+71 = 167. Since the same phrasing ("ranked in the world") is used for players in the main tour (which I consider to be correct), it should be made clear that the PIOS ranking is 96 places under. Otherwise we end up with two player being ranked 1 in the world (and it becomes unclear which one is nr 1 and which one is nr 97). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.96.133.193 (talk) 12:01, 28 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Reanne Evans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Reanne Evans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Reanne Evans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Reanne Evans/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BennyOnTheLoose (talk · contribs) 21:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 20:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

[edit]

Prose

[edit]

Lede

[edit]

General

[edit]
  • ] She won her first ranking tournament, the Connie Gough Memorial Championship, in 2004. This was the only women's ranking event held in the 2003–04 season, after Allison Fisher, then the top female player in the rankings, had departed from the circuit to play nine-ball pool in the United States. - I'm not sure how these two things are connected. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the semi-finals of the 2015 championship, Ng and Evans were level at 2–2. Ng made a 55 break in the fifth frame, winning it 84–0. Following an unsuccessful safety shot on the brown ball by Evans in the sixth frame, Ng won 51–47 on the black. - this sort of just ends. There's no info about the match result, nor why we went into so much detail about the match. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review meta comments

[edit]
Many thanks, Lee Vilenski. I've replied to the points above. Let me know if anything else is required. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.