Talk:Real Politics Union

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties / Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Is this all the information there is on Polands Real Politics Union in English???? Surely someone must know more.

Electoral results

Can someone write something about the electoral results of the party? --Checco 13:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The party doesn't receive money from public budget (other parties takes public money) and it has financial problems. It consistently enjoys the support of approximately 2-4% of voters. UPR'candidates were starting from a new conservative-liberal organisation Janusz Korwin-Mikke's Platform (Platforma Janusza Korwin-Mikke). PJKM didn't manage to cross the required 5% threshold in the 2005 parliamentary elections. It party had the support 2% of voters. --Miszaromuk

Good. Write it in the article! --Checco 08:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I change "doesn't recive" to "doesn't take", to inform UPR don't want this money.

No-qanek 12:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can say that in this elections (october this year, the campaign had started) UPR is going in coalition with nacional-conservative party "Liga Polskich Rodzin" ( League of Polish Families) and with catholic-conservative "Prawica RP" (Right of the Republic), from the list od LPR (League of the Right of the Republic) It's an election coalition. In one of the polls they have 7% of support. And they started an internet campaign just now. You can see it on this blog made by Young supporters of UPR

http://wybory2007upr.wordpress.com/

, and this official first in Poland political party television made becouse the mainstreame media are censoring UPR

http://www.uprtv.pl/uprtv/uprtv_index.php

all in polish...

For more info please contact me: robakk@mail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robakk (talk • contribs) 02:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The flag

A special colour variation of St George's Cross

Why does the article say this? Was it a documented, public decision by the party to produce something that was "a special colour variation of St George's Cross" (whatever that means), or did the editor who wrote that just think it was? Heraldically, this is not any kind of variation of St George's cross, because the colours are different: just because two designs have a single honourable ordinary in common doesn't make them variations of one another. The Wednesday Island (talk) 16:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they wrote in their party statute that their flag is blue St George's Cross with white edge on black background. In polish here http://upr.polityczne.net/Statut_UPR —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.16.109.58 (talk) 00:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support for NAFTA?

Is that supposed to read "support for NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)"? I didn't realise the US/Canada/Mexico free trade agreement was such a hot topic in European politics!99.237.223.144 (talk) 12:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not. UPR is actually in favour of Poland _joining_ the NAFTA. George Bush senior in 1992, during his presidential campaign inJuly, made a very brief mention of a possibility of Poland, Czech Republic and Hungary joining the NAFTA. NAFTA agreement was signed in December 1992, and these countries were not included. Nowadays it seems more of a wishful thinking, but UPR is still in favour of trying to negotiate Poland's entry into NAFTA. See this page: http://www.asme.pl/serwis/arch/24-25-2000.html (in Polish), http://www.magazynfakty.pl/a87-unia-europejska.htm (in Polish) or this one: http://www.mail-archive.com/pen-l@galaxy.csuchico.ed/msg69584.html. I could not find any reliable source of the speech itself, but the first two links may be considered reliable sources for the existence of such a policy of UPR. ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.206.138.147 (talk) 18:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the last link should be: http://www.mail-archive.com/pen-l%40galaxy.csuchico.edu/msg69584.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.206.138.147 (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I remember that JKM wrote somewhere that Poland is closer to New York than Honolulu is. Haveanaccount1 (talk) 17:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PZL Tytus eslemoce

to Patia polityczna i grupa i klub od 2023 października 6 stworzyło patia Polski lider Maciej ołyniuk 5.173.198.43 (talk) 12:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]