Talk:Reactions to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ukraine Mid‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: History Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

Military history: European / Russian & Soviet / Post-Cold War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Section sizes

Section size for Reactions to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis (51 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	697	697
Ukraine	19,234	19,234
Russia	36,893	44,089
Russian citizens	26	7,196
Anti-war	4,640	4,640
Intellectuals	1,558	1,558
Military	972	972
Belarus	2,078	2,078
NATO	12,012	12,012
United Nations	5,569	5,569
Other countries' reactions	241	119,961
Europe	16,768	50,582
Baltic states	4,228	4,228
Finland and Sweden	3,056	3,056
France	1,885	1,885
Germany	7,262	7,262
Poland	5,841	5,841
United Kingdom	11,542	11,542
North America	20	26,732
Canada	1,659	1,659
United States	25,053	25,053
Latin America	20	15,526
Argentina	5,365	5,365
Brazil	1,241	1,241
Chile	3,429	3,429
Colombia	1,644	1,644
Uruguay	1,477	1,477
Venezuela	2,350	2,350
Asia	11	17,105
China	2,201	2,201
Indonesia	1,500	1,500
Israel	2,404	2,404
Japan	1,100	1,100
Malaysia	4,887	4,887
Singapore	1,041	1,041
South Korea	524	524
Taiwan	1,684	1,684
Vietnam	1,753	1,753
Oceania	14	4,134
Australia	2,906	2,906
New Zealand	1,214	1,214
Africa	16	5,641
Kenya	2,507	2,507
South Africa	3,118	3,118
Civil society	18	9,075
Anonymous hacker group	4,427	4,427
Belarusian opposition	1,905	1,905
Metropolis of Bessarabia	1,131	1,131
Ukrainian civil society	1,594	1,594
See also	185	185
References	7,041	7,041
Total	219,941	219,941

Suggestion to correct title

I would suggest changing the article name to "Reactions to the 2021-2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis". It's grammatically correct - at least. No more elaborations are needed. PenangLion (talk) 11:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reaction of the People’s Republic of China

China says the US is the ‘main instigator’ of the war in Ukraine - https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/8/10/china-accuses-us-as-main-instigator-of-the-war-in-ukraine

China hammers home its message of US blame for Ukraine war to domestic audience - https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3172228/china-hammers-home-its-message-us-blame-ukraine-war-domestic (Chinese gov’t owned news agency admitting this) Solidarityandfreedom (talk) 00:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Scholz-Putin press conference (2022-02-15).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:21, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name

@TankDude2000 I contest your move to "Reactions to the Prelude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine". The current title is better. It is non-idiomatic to say "reactions to the prelude (of something)", and mildly nonsensical. The reactions were to concrete, individual, events during this period, which was afterwards characterized as the prelude. The title is also miscapitalized (Prelude). —Alalch E. 09:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then revert the other page as well! TankDude2000 (talk) 15:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I won't. Perhaps other editors will agree with you that this article should be named something like "Reactions in the prelude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine". To this end, you may start a discussion per WP:RM#CM.—Alalch E. 18:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]