Talk:Ravens Bluff

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 July 2017. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Spelling

To be honest, I have no idea whether it should be spelled "Ravens" or "Raven's", as I've seen it written as both. We need some official source to clarify that. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 05:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't help you on that, but I must say that the article looks much better now. I'd redirected it because there hadn't been much improvement since it had been restored, but now it certainly needs its own article. Good work! -Drilnoth (talk) 15:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Well, Forgotten Realms Wiki calls this location "Raven's Bluff", but then again the novels they cite call it "Ravens Bluff". I've just checked page 214 of FRCS and that has this as "Ravens Bluff" too. I suppose it could be "a bluff of many ravens" rather than "a bluff belonging to a raven". Big Mac (talk) 01:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Organised Play link dead?

The "Organised Play" link (an external link in the main text) wasn't working today. That might just be a temporary thing, but it might also be a dead link. Would someone keep an eye on this link and take appropriate action if the link doesn't come back within a week or two? Big Mac (talk) 01:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yeah no, still dead189.178.66.170 (talk) 20:23, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]