User talk:71.194.32.252

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (71.194.32.252) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Jclemens (talk) 02:17, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

(continued) Glad to have you helping out on games-related articles. I do encourage you to sign up for a username of your choosing--IP editors can never really gain a "reputation" of positive contributions, and many vandals use IP addresses so your contributions may receive extra scrutiny. Jclemens (talk) 03:00, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Dybbuk (Dungeons & Dragons) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ^{ZOMG BBQ} 22:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Comment from another Wikipedian I've just looked at the mentioned edit and it was the constructive addition of a category of a redirect page, so I was wondering why you had reverted 71.194.32.252's edit. -Drilnoth (talk) 20:29, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Luke Cage

Hi there. I've reverted your edits on the article for Luke Cage. While we should always strive to include verifiable information with sources, filling an article with requests for specific issue numbers is not productive. If you feel a statement is erroneous, remove it or tag that specific bit as requiring a citation; there's no need to tag every sentence. Matt Deres (talk) 02:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject: Dungeons & Dragons

• Hi! I’ve been working on a lot of ‘’Dungeons & Dragons’’ articles lately and saw that you have too, and am inviting you to rejoin Wikipedia’s D&D group. I've been hard at work removing tags placed inappropriately on D&D articles, as well as modifying articles to remove tags that were placed legitimately. In addition, I have been compiling related articles together so that the articles are longer, making it easier to remove tags and to have short articles on lesser topics by just putting it into another appropriate article (links to such compiled articles can be found on my userpage). Check out the project here , and ask any questions that you may have here. Thank you for your time. Drilnoth (talk) 20:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Leujohn ^{(talk, How did I do?)} 03:22, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Edit War

I'm ery sorry for the wrong warning. I am currently on vandalism patrol, and they moved the "Edit summary" message (the one you see above) to the bottom of the menu and the spot the button was supposed to be in was changed to the "Edit War" warning. I will remove the warning right away. I'm very sorry for the confusion it caused. Leujohn ^{(talk, How did I do?)} 03:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Keraptis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 03:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Notability tags

Hi! I've noticed that you've been removing a number of {{notability}} tags from various Dungeons & Dragons articles. It's great to see another person doing work on D&D articles, but I request that you stop removing the notability tags without otherwise changing the article... I know as much as you do that the subjects are notable, but as it is many articles don't show why they're notable to someone who doesn't play D&D so the tag is, sadly, appropriate. If you could add a few secondary sources to the articles, or at least add the {{primarysources}} tag, when you remove the{{notability}} tag, it would be much appreciated. Thank you. -Drilnoth (talk) 20:29, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I just don't want to see the articles get deleted. When the notability template sits on an article for too long, someone is bound to nominate it for deletion, as is the case with Sharn (Forgotten Realms) and many others. From now on, I'll replace the notability tag with primarysources tag - at least with that one, there's no veiled threat of deletion. Thanks for the suggestion. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 20:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome... it just seemed kind of unfair to just remove the tag because those articles don't indicate their notability at this time. The primarysources tag will be a good replacement (personally I wish there wasn't such a thing as a notability tag because primarysources means the same thing but without, as you said, a "veiled threat of deletion"). -Drilnoth (talk) 22:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Witchlight Marauder

Thanks for adding that back in in the Witchlight marauder article... I just saw a speculative challenge rating the the reiteration of a source; I didn't notice the novel reference. -Drilnoth (talk) 18:26, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem! :) 71.194.32.252 (talk) 20:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Restoring Articles

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Blibdoolpoolp has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 05:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Eshowdow constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 05:07, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Iyachtu Xvim. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 05:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't see how that's vandalism. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 05:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

All those articles were redirected because they were non-notable. Recreating them is thus against consensus and when done repeatably, is disruptive and can be construed as vandalism. Do not continue recreating the articles over the redirects. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 05:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Outside question: What if those articles were modified to show their notability? -Drilnoth (talk) 12:57, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Another outside question: Those articles never had an AfD or PROD, so how was it community consensus? -Drilnoth (talk) 13:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Man, I don't know, and I don't expect a real answer. If you and I agree on restoring them, then that's two people, and more "consensus" than it took to redirect them in the first place... 71.194.32.252 (talk) 13:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, why don't we just leave the articles as redirects for now, and then when the WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons members find some refs, we can restore them.

Also, I'd like to point out to you that you probably wouldn't get as many "vandalism" messages like that if you had a username... IP address users are always on the "Newbie Contribs" list, so they are being watch much more closely than autoconfirmed users are, to try and prevent vandalism. It only takes about a minute to get a username and password, so if that's possible for you you might want to look into it. Just a thought. -Drilnoth (talk) 16:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Additionally, I don't think that you were supposed to have gotten all of those tags; WP:UTM says that you should not add 2 or more tags simultaneously, to make sure that the user has the chance to see them. The 1-minute period between two of the tags is virtually simultaneous. -Drilnoth (talk) 16:38, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

that's huggle for you. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 05:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Notability tags, again

I just wanted to point out that a lot of the articles you've removed notability tags from are having them restored; just a gentle reminder that you should probably add {{importance}} so that that doesn't happen as much. -Drilnoth (talk) 16:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

OK thanks, that's a good idea. I didn't know that option existed - i will do that from now on. i was using your earlier advice of switching it out with the {{primarysources}} tag, but most of them already had that one! 71.194.32.252 (talk) 05:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

• A better idea would be to restore the cleanup tags that you have removed if you don't indend effecting any cleanup. I will restore the tages for you if you don't have time to make any improvement to the articles you have been editing. --Gavin Collins (talk) 11:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

• Your mission, Gavin, would be fruitless. Users of the D&D public watchlist will just revert your edits. -Drilnoth (talk) 13:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

My mommy told me not to let bullies push me around. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 01:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Dungeons & Dragons Barnstar
		For your excellent and much-appreciated work finding, restoring, and updating the tags on D&D articles, I hearby award of the Dungeons & Dragons Barnstar. Drilnoth (talk) 15:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Wow... thanks! :) I really appreciate that... but I'm not done yet! :) 71.194.32.252 (talk) 01:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

I know. I just thought a little encouragement could never hurt, especially with Gavin around. -Drilnoth (talk) 02:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, you're right! 71.194.32.252 (talk) 03:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

I see you reverted your own edit - honest mistake. :) 71.194.32.252 (talk) 16:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Just since you've been getting quite a few mistaken and/or N/A warnings recently, I thought I'd remind you that you can delete or archive warnings that you have read. -Drilnoth (talk) 16:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Eh, I'll leave it, it doesn't bother me. I'm taking a D&D break right now - too much heat on me at the moment. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 17:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, I hope that you can come back soon; we need all the help we can get! -Drilnoth (talk) 17:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

I understand. Gavin is back to his old routine with a vengeance. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Geez, I'm sorry, I thought I had removed the warning I gave you. I was on Huggle, and I went to go back to get a vandalism I had passed over, and I accidentally clicked "back" three times instead of twice. Again, I apologize for my lack of attentiveness. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 17:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem, like I said, honest mistake. It's good work that you do! :) 71.194.32.252 (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

AIV

Hey, I saw that Gavin had done this, and thought that you should see it. The issue seems to have been resolved with no effect, but if you'd like me to post anything on Gavin's talk page about it (since that page is semi-protected), just let me know. -Drilnoth (talk) 13:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I doesn't matter; I checked it myself and saw that they had closed the case stale. Good thing I took a break from that. ;) 71.194.32.252 (talk) 13:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Honestly, I don't understand how Gavin can say that you are vandalizing Wikipedia; I think that it's the other way around. And believe me, if admins had actually done something I think that the entire D&D WikiProject would have come out in support of you. -Drilnoth (talk) 13:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

i don't understand anything gavin says. but thanks for the vote of support! 71.194.32.252 (talk) 00:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:D&D vs. Gavin.collins dispute

Hi. I am working on something to try and help in the dispute, and wanted to ask if you thought that the following accurately represented your contributions to Wikipedia, especially in regards to the dispute. If you want anything changed before I make an official announcement of my intentions (making it subject to potential scrutiny from others involved in the conflict), please let me know. If you would like to have your name removed from all discussion involving Gavin and WP:D&D, we can do that, too. If you want more information before you decide, just ask. Thanks!
"

• 71.194.32.252 (talk || contribs)
  • Background: 71.194.32.252 began editing Wikipedia on October 25, 2008. His contributions have mainly been focused on comics and D&D-related articles, along with work on some other games. Recent edits in the D&D field include replacing {{notability}} tags with {{importance}} tags and restoring previously deleted articles. On November 17, he received three warnings from Sephiroth BCR about articles that he was restoring but not making improvements to; since then he has made improvements to most restored articles.
  • Involvement: 71.194.32.252 has come into conflict with Gavin.collins because of his replacing {{notability}} with {{importance}} tags. On November 20, Gavin identified him as an IPVandal, saying in Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, "IP has been removing cleanup templates without giving any reason or effecting any cleanup." (viewable here). The request was later declined by StephenBuxton because 71.194.32.252 had been insufficiently and/or incorrectly warned (viewable here).

"
-Drilnoth (talk) 17:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

sorry, but i'm not interested in participating. not that i don't believe in your cause, but as it is i've already been dragged pretty far out of my usual role as a wikignome... please do remove as much information about me as you can without compromising your case. i wish you luck in dealing with the dispute resolution process. i'd rather quit editing D&D articles altogether than get anymore involved than i already seem to be. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 01:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Sure thing, that's why I asked. I will remove your name from the list and I hope that you continue making improvements as you have been. -Drilnoth (talk) 01:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

thanks - hope it goes well. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 01:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Categories

Hi there. Please don't add categories to redirect pages, sometimes it prevents them from redirecting. Also don't remove valid categories from articles such as you did from Eberron. Thanks. Canterbury Tail talk 20:59, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Outside Comment I've seen plenty of redirects with categories, and they always seem to work fine for me. -Drilnoth (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Another Outside Comment Also, the removal of Category:Dungeons & Dragons books from Eberron was completely justified. Eberron is a campaign setting, a fictional universe, not a book or publication. -Drilnoth (talk) 21:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh yes, my bad on the Eberron one. It's not a book, even though the Campaign Setting page redirects to it. Canterbury Tail talk 21:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

No prob! That's why I put the cat on the redirect instead. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 21:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Recreation of deleted material per a deletion discussion,

Per your recreation of this article. This article was deleted/redirected per a deletion discussion at an AfD. If you wish to restore the article, please ask for a deletion review.— Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 02:30, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Outside question: Where is the deletion discussion? I didn't see a link on the article talk page, nor can I find one searching through the AFD archives. -Drilnoth (talk) 02:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

I checked this one to see if there had been an AFD and there was not. My apologies for disturbing its eternal slumber. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 08:01, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I would like to say my bad on this one. This article was the subject of a small amount of debate, since it did not meet WP:N at the time, and, boldly, an editor moved to redirect it to the parent article. There was no AfD, but there is now. We didn't have consensus before to redirect it, but it is looking like we will, and we will have a reason to redirect it as per consensus if created again. You can participate if you like, the link to the discussion is on the said article.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 04:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Gavin.collins RFC/U

Hello. A request for comment on user conduct has recently been filed regarding Gavin.collins. Since you have been involved in the dispute regarding his disruptive edits, I thought that you would want to know. You can see the RFC/U here. Thank you. -Drilnoth (talk) 21:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks; I'll have a look. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 01:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. -Drilnoth (talk) 02:01, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Cult of the Dragon has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 17:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Redirects

Hey, just thought I'd mention that adding {{D&D}} to redirects that never had non-redirect content isn't really needed (I've changed my mind since earlier). Having redirects that used to have non-redirect material tagged is excellent because it puts them all in one place for referencing. Just thought I'd mention it. -Drilnoth (talk) 21:03, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Ah, thanks, you're probably right. All that drama earlier was probably a bit silly in retrospect. Regarding Robh Ruppel, I noticed that he had a redirect but never an article, so I figured maybe one day someone would turn it into an article if they are so inclined. I don't think I will though. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 21:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Gotcha; that makes sense. Still, I think that if someone was going to create an article about Robh Ruppel, they probably wouldn't do so after just seeing a redirect page. That said, whenever you find a redirect that has non-redirect history, by all means tag it! -Drilnoth (talk) 21:15, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Please do not undo double redirects. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:28, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

That's really not what I was doing... 71.194.32.252 (talk) 02:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Moonsea has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jake Wartenberg^talk 23:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

OK... weird. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 23:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Moonsea constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jake Wartenberg^talk 23:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't vandalizing anything... nevermind. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 23:18, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Ghost Rider (Daniel Ketch) edits

While there's no harm in placing the FF appearance before the Hulk appearance in the article section, as it is alphabetical, your rational of putting the FF appearance first because of chronological order is actually incorrect, as the Hulk appearance aired first, before the FF one. The 1994 date for FF refers to when the series started. In short, the FF series started in 1994, the Hulk series in 1996, but Ghost Rider appeared on Hulk before he appeared on FF. oknazevad (talk) 01:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

OK, no biggie, it was just a thought I had. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 01:37, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Didn't consider it a biggie either, which is why I didn't revert. just figured I'd elaborate.oknazevad (talk) 01:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Wu Pi Te Shao has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bangelfire\.com\b' (link(s): http://www.angelfire.com/ne/RichieM/AQ/wpm.html) .

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

My bad - I have removed the offending link. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 02:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Treant

I redirected this to Ent so that any relevant discussion could go there. Additionally, the term treant isn't exclusive to D&D and in fact the WoWWiki page is ironically the first result in a Google search. Paliku (talk) 21:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Merging

Hey, just thought I'd mention that when you merge articles, you should leave links to the other article in both edit summaries to fully comply with GFDL requirements. For example, if you merge material from Article A to Article B, give A an edit summary of "merged into Article B" and B an edit summary of "Merged from Article A". -Drilnoth (talk) 21:38, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks, no problem. I'm just about done merging those articles in, and I should be finished soon. Probably not today, though! 71.194.32.252 (talk) 22:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good. -Drilnoth (talk) 02:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

I've notified EyeSerene. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 14:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Blocked and tagged. Good catch, thanks ;) EyeSerene^talk 19:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

No problem! Glad to be of service. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 03:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Greyhawk characters, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Greyhawk characters was changed by 71.194.32.252 (u) (t) deleting 28678 characters on 2009-02-01T15:48:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Nice work on the Greyhawk characters

You should think about getting an account, although you probably have already and are against it. You're IP gives away more info than an account, if that's a concern. It says your ISP is in Chicago. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 04:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm not concerned, but thanks. I try to help out where I can around here, mostly by doing little stuff. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 04:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

That's cool. We always need all the help we can get with D&D. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 04:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Random style pointers that I noticed you could use: date ranges (and other numerical ranges) use an en dash and not a hyphen (498–510, not 498-510) per Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Dashes. Wikipedia uses logical quotations, so write "Her honorifics include 'Her Fey Majesty', the 'Faerie Queen',..." instead of "Her honorifics include 'Her Fey Majesty,' the 'Faerie Queen,'..." Those are little minor things that usually take a while for editors to notice. By the way, if you want to expand a merged topic, there's no need to touch the original article—just add it directly to the merge target. Pagrashtak 15:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Styx and Stone has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bwikia\.com\b (links: http://marvel.wikia.com/wiki/styx_and_stone_(earth-616)).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:46, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Quicksilver!

Yeah, you should totally get an account, especially since IP addresses can change unless you've got a static IP, and then any new edits you make would be under a different user page, with a different talk page as well.

So anyway, yes, Quicksilver is both mutant and mutate, it's mentioned in the section on mutates, but to be more clear: He was a mutant, was turned back into a human at the end of House of M/start of Decimation, and then turned into a mutate via exposure to the Terrigen Mist. Since then, he's regained his original powers, it's not clear if he retains his secondary mutate powers at this point, but at the least: he is a mutant and is/was a mutate as well.

Cheers!---D--- (talk) 13:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Barack Obama

This encounter with Obama is only an anectdote and this storyarc of only five pages at some undetermined point within this chronology has no repercutions or importante in Spider-Man's life

OK, thanks. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 16:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

User

How come you aren't a user yet? You make a lot of contributions, in article talk pages and everything. How come your not a user? -- A ^talk/_contribs 20:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the concern. It's no big deal, I just like to wiki-gnome. It's not myspace, so I don't need a user page. :) 71.194.32.252 (talk) 23:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Ahah, that's awesome. Thanks for your contributions regardless. -- A ^talk/_contribs 21:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Jennifer Kale

I searched Avengers: The Initiative #19 for Jennifer Kale and was not able to find her. Please let me know a page number, or I will have to remove it. The only crowds of superheroes I saw that were not amorphous were several Avengers surrounding Captain Marvel in space and a flashback to Captain Marvel on his deathbed, where Jennifer should not have been, but I didn't look to carefully. I certainly didn't see a big group of heroes fighting Skrulls where she might have been hidden.--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 03:36, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll look again next time I'm at the store. There were many copies in the bin. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 03:44, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

It turns out that I was paying more attention to numbers than titles. It was actually a copy of The Mighty Avengers #19 that I was looking at, mixed in with issues of Avengers: The Initiative, so I was totally wrong in questioning you.--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 02:33, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Blob (comics). Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Kortaggio ^{Proclamations} _Declarations 00:53, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Replied on your talk page. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 03:20, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Ah, you caught me! I sincerely apologise (I'm only human!), but I meant to post this comment on 68.9.152.28's talk page instead of yours, it gets really confusing when you deal with IP addresses all day--you could create an account for yourself maybe? Again, I'm so very sorry, and I hope you were not offended in any way.

Here is a cookie for your troubles — Kortaggio ^{Proclamations} _Declarations 02:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

— Kortaggio ^{Proclamations} _Declarations 02:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Was some of this cited before?

Nope - the article (Doctor Strange) is a dog - at some stage today, I'll try and find issue numbers for all of those. Add as many issue cites as you feel you need to! --Cameron Scott (talk) 12:56, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks - I wasn't sure, and didn't feel like spending an hour looking through all the revisions. ;) 71.194.32.252 (talk) 12:57, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

It really needs the input of an expert on the character - there is about a decade of appearances missing and what is there needs more re-writing from someone with a firm grip on the character. --Cameron Scott (talk) 13:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Carnage (comics), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Carnage (comics) was changed by 71.194.32.252 (u) (t) deleting 15912 characters on 2009-04-26T19:57:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

That wasn't vandalism... 71.194.32.252 (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

12:56, 5 May 2009 71.194.32.252 (talk) (5,861 bytes) (rvt - umber hulks exist in the Terminator series?)

Why yes they do. Google is your friend. Now be a good trivia bot and Google, Terminator and Umber Hulk. What did you find, hmmm?

--Dana (talk) 13:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Actually, it's on the person who adds information to provide a source, and anyone else can remove challenged material. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 00:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Suggestion

Thanks for the linking in Savras, you should get a real account! Hekerui (talk) 09:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

re: Marvel Zombies series

Sorry about that.

I don't read any of the Marvel Zombies series, but from the information I have, I just assumed they were all set in an alternate world. Sorry for the confusion there.

I've slightly edited Digger (comics) in the hope that the same confusion I had can be avoided in other readers. :) Stephen Day (talk) 04:03, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fictional history of Spider-Man

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Fictional history of Spider-Man. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional history of Spider-Man (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Fictional history of Spider-Man

There is a discussion now about an article you are one of the major contributors too. Talk:Fictional_history_of_Spider-Man#Rewrite_and_replacement It concerns replacing the entire article with something fairly unrelated. Dream Focus 10:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stillsong

The article Stillsong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this fictional character passes GNG/NFICTION, pure PLOT with PRIMARY sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

---