This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
Example usage of ranked-choice voting as synonym of STV
you have linked to WP:ONEOTHER, but the DAB clearly contains two (which is greater than one) other usage of the term. if you scroll down the page and read WP:TWOOTHER, you will see
> If there are two or three other topics, it is still possible to use a hatnote which lists the other topics explicitly, but if this would require too much text (roughly, if the hatnote would extend well over one line on a standard page), then it is better to create a disambiguation page and refer only to that.
STV is not "the proportional variant of Ranked-choice voting." it is the proportional variant of IRV, which is a specific kind of ranked-choice voting. and this ambiguity is exactly the purpose of a disambiguation page to disambiguate. Affinepplan (talk) 01:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The guideline you linked is for cases where there is a primary topic, which I don't think is the case here. Moreover, in this case, because the topics are closely related, the terminology is confusing, and the subject matter is relatively complex, I think there's a larger-than-usual risk of readers ending up at the wrong page and not realizing it. For many ambiguous titles, a redirect plus hatnote is enough, but in this case the added risk of confusion is part of why I think the disambiguation page (or set index) is helpful. —Mx. Granger (talk·contribs) 04:42, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]