Talk:Ramlila ground protests

This is the hottest and most covered topic of June 2011. http://news.google.co.in/news/more?pz=1&cf=all&ned=in&ncl=dNLWCMh9XAtmriM-Vlqg6fZA643LM&topic=h Article needs to be improved. (Aawwaajj (talk) 07:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Renaming the article

Probable other names:

Swami Ramdev's satyagraha
Protests by Swami Ramdev for black money
2011 Swami Ramdev anti-corruption movement

The names that you think are better than the present name can be enlisted above. (Aawwaajj (talk) 07:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Article Merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge the article with 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement. GaneshBhakt (talk) 19:46, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I propose an article merge with 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement.

Support

Please list your !vote below:

Wikivishalvikas (talk): Definitely should be merged. It is a part of the anti corruption movement Wikivishalvikas (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:32, 12 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]
GaneshBhakt (talk): As nom. GaneshBhakt (talk) 16:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Joyson Noel (talk): Makes sense to me. The objective is the same. It's part of the wider movement, rather than a separate one in and of itself. Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me!} 17:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kannan Reddy (talk)

Considering the fact that Ramdev now has decided to shift his place of his Satyagraha/protest to Haridwar. I support this merge. Kannan Reddy (talk) 18:11, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sitush (talk): Part of the wider movement and would make more sense incorporated into that. Seems like a weighting issue otherwise. - Sitush (talk) 17:58, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Qwyrxian (talk): This article doesn't even make sense, given that there were no ground protests in Ramlila, right? Pardon me while I express just a little frustration, but Wikipedia cannot be used as a place to promote upcoming events. Heck, we even need to be extremely wary of reporting events just as they are happening. Wikipedia is not supposed to be a first responder; go to Wikinews for that. Once the events have happened, their scope is clear, and their notability established, then we can write an encyclopedic summary of them--not a day by day timeline. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:04, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Abhishek Sharma (talk): This should be merged and cleaned as well according to wikipedian standard.--abhishek (talk) 05:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apoorv020 (talk)vote: Seems to be a fair choice, since the actual events at the protest ground itself are not extensive, and the protests will be actually fighting corruption. Apoorv020 (talk) 22:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Please list your !vote below:

The Ramlila Grounds events, needs a separate article or page in in itself, which can be shown as a see or further : Ramlila Ground Protest or Ramlila Ground Events in the page 2011 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement. As it is Ramlila ground events, for which the government was blamed for in apt handling and it is for this event the Supreme Court has taken suo moto cognizance. and definitely as the hearing proceeds further info will be added to this page. The title of page mentions Ramlila Grounds and people search internet for Ramlila ground events and not 2011 anti corruption movement.Jethwarp (talk) 02:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Further 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement page deals with protest held by Anna Hazare for Lokpal Bill and this one was by Baba Ramdev for black money stashed in Swiss Banks. I think think the 2011 Indian anti corruption movement page should be renamed to identify it with subject like Lokpal Bill Protest and both the events spreaheaded by Swami Ramdev and Anna Hazare be included in a new page which again can be named as 2011 Indian anti corruption movement.Jethwarp (talk) 03:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose There is a detailed article here with 50 references almost all of which are about this specific incident and not about the 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement in general. This information ought not be condensed because the media thought to record many details from this event, and the citations are referencing a lot of different things. It also would not be right to merge it in entirety with the anti-corruption movement article, which is long enough already and this event is only a small part of that movement. Many people in support of the merge above seem to be opposed to the current name of this article, and I agree, this article is inadequately named. I propose that it be renamed 2011 Swami Ramdev anti-corruption movement to parallel with the mail article and to describe the limits of the coverage of this topic. To any people who think this article is not notable for Wikipedia, I would ask whether they think this topic was notable to the media. I think international coverage by literally of hundreds of newspapers proves that this event was notable in its own right aside from the general anticorruption movement. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

Please list your !vote below:

Neutral i.e. merge as well - The page offers some details of the event that may not be exhaustively presented in the merged article. In other words, this article should be taken as a main article to a subsection in the 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement i.e. mentioning in both articles with relative weights as per article in consideration. ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011 08:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think we should wait for few more days as things are unfolding regarding the Supreme Court's suo motu notice, notices issued by National Human Rights Commission to the Union and Delhi governments and the clarity on correlation of this protests with 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement.( Aanna Hazare team).-- . Shlok _{talk .} 11:33, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[| Edit reversd] by User:Abhishekitmbm

Hi, why was this edit done without giving any reasons? ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011 09:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in reference section

Errors generated in the absence of title/name tags should be corrected. ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011 10:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please mention exact title/name tags,which should be corrected.--abhishek (talk) 10:31, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When a reference is used again on the same page, a pointer is used instead of repeating the link again. The title part is needed in cite: reference tag otherwise it will generate error. I think the errors are already corrected. ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011 10:34, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--abhishek (talk) 10:48, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia standards

Please mention wikipedia standards while editing.This article require a lot of cleaning,even for merging.Please do it accordingly.Especially events section requires clean up.--abhishek (talk) 10:34, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]