User talk:Abhishekitmbm

Welcome!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Chzz ► 10:11, 19

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in Ramlila ground protests - reference section

Hi, please correct these errors by giving name to links and title tag correctly. ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011 10:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done--abhishek (talk) 12:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits in Anna Hazare article

Perhaps if you had the patience to read the whole article before editing, you could find out that your additions were already there in an earlier section, where the circumstances of forming P B Sawant Commission and its indictments are mentioned. I have already initiated a section in the talk page of the article about your edits. You are welcome to participate there. Joy1963^Talk 07:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ready

Read talk page before reverting anything. There's already a consensus on talk page. Thanks. Scieberking (talk) 19:31, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I read posted two edits regarding Critical response section and gave a proper reason for what I did--abhishek (talk) 10:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Abhishekitmbm,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Infobox titles

Please do not insert POV into the titles of infoboxes, as you did at 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement. I do realise that the previous title was equally poor, btw. - Sitush (talk) 12:42, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okays will try not to do this again.Thanks.--abhishek (talk) 12:45, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Revolution 2020: Love, Corruption, Ambition for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revolution 2020: Love, Corruption, Ambition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolution 2020: Love, Corruption, Ambition until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:34, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited

	To Wikipedia's 11th Anniversary Celebrations!
	An invitation for you to come and join us for Wikipedia's 11th Anniversary Celebrations in Delhi on the 15th Jan 2012: Click here for more details. Will be great to see you! :) Nitika.t (talk) 13:20, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was so eager to attend my first meeting with wikipedians specially on the occasions of 11th anniversary.But I am unfortunate date 15th January is already scheduled for some personal and unavoidable work!!!So nice of you for inviting me,please keep sharing this kind of meting details.--abhishek (talk) 15:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ERRORS ON AGNEEPATH

If you hadn't noticed that the FIGURES IN THE ARTICLE DO NOT CORRESPOND TO THE FIGURES ON THE SOURCES! I AM ADDING THAT WARNING IN AGAIN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashermadan (talk • contribs) 10:23, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.I checked all refs from 32 to 35.Text on wiki page is exactly same as in citations(on BOI). Would you please elaborate what makes you say FIGURES IN THE ARTICLE DO NOT CORRESPOND TO THE FIGURES ON THE SOURCES!--Sandy (talk) 10:30, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

When using the WP:PROD procedure, as you did at Thakur Arjun Singh, please provide a reason for deletion in the template, for example {{subst:PROD|reason for proposed deletion}}. I have added a reason to that article, but please bear this in mind in the future. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--Sandy (talk) 10:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Raghu Ram

FYI your repeated deletion of the Indian Idol comments is ridiculuous. At first, I did not remember Raghu coming, but I clearly remembere there was a person who did stretching exercises and was rude and did a "gun" gesture after he was rejected. This was one of the standout auditions of the first season. Later, I saw a tape of the whole episode belonging to a friend. I suspect you are a chamcha of Raghu's. I will shortly upload the whole episode and request Wikipedia to ban you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JICKY999 (talk • contribs) 09:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well as I've already said I am neither of favoring of deleting or in posting this video detail,but the information is provided is ill cited an doesn't worth of mentioning on wikipedia.I've already watched video published by official channel and even they didn't mention that he was in audition.Well if want to update a page,go ahead,respect policies.And one last thing.Its second time you are threatening to blocking me,go ahead and read Wikipedia:Blocking policy first.--Sandy (talk) 10:30, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- @sandy: whatver. @abhishek: "I've already watched video published by official channel and even they didn't mention that he was in audition " WTF? Why will the channel mention Raghu auditioned if he was nto famous at the time? Someone has dug out old footage of an incident that happened when raghu was not there. I remember the incident vividly and can provide links to old orkut groups where people discuss about a rude contestant to did stretching exercises and pointed a gun at the judges. Nobody remembered the guy's face coz he was a loser and it happened a long time ago. Turns out the guy was Raghu. And bt pal, maybe you should watch this. So many computer special effects wizards faking footage, eh??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ld-a7DYz-cs

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1362622/Jay-Leno-embarrasses-Simon-Cowell-digs-footage-X-Factor-boss-Sale-Century-quiz-90s.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by JICKY999 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you just mention about orkut groups...lol..well I can give you hundreds of groups on web where discussion of this link is considered as fake.remember buddy its wiki and not user discussion group.--Sandy (talk) 10:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You moron, I was referring to orkut groups dating back to 2003 or whenever the first season took place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JICKY999 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

watch your words carefully you stupid creature,your kind of ppl shouln't be allowed to even read on wiki..next time u abuse me,and will knock u out.--Sandy (talk) 12:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Housefull 2: The Dirty Dozen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Shaan and Wajid

Paan Singh Tomar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Irfan Khan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Sandy (talk) 09:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ra.One

Its been clarified that IMDb ratings can't be used as WP:RS. Please do not add it again. ~*~Ankit Bhatt~*~ 14:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okays.Thanks for the information.Had you provided this information in edit summary,it could have saved some efforts of us.--Sandy (talk) 14:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Paan Singh Tomar (Athlete), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Pol430 talk to me 20:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Abhishekitmbm. You have new messages at Pol430's talk page.
Message added 20:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Pol430 talk to me 20:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Episode Synopsis for MTV Roadies

Hey there, i was just wondering whether it would be convenient for you to update summaries of the episodes on the MTV Roadies (season 9) =) I've seen that you've made some edits on the page, i'd really appreciate if you would help the article grow. Thank you! --Heyhello1234567 (talk) 17:10, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Chai Garam

Hello Abhishekitmbm, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Chai Garam to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:44, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gangs of Wasseypur part1

It is good that the new page of Gangs Of Wasseypur Part 1 has been created but it would have been better had it been put up at the talk page with the people working on it.Ayanosh (talk) 13:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes It may have,but it is quiet evident that every notable movie should have its own page.What information should be where can be discussed in detail at talk page.Thnaks--Sandy (talk) 14:43, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thakur Arjun Singh

I've removed your AfD tag from Thakur Arjun Singh (renamed after tagging) as you did not complete the nomination process. If you still feel the article should be deleted, please see WP:AFDHOWTO for instructions on the nomination process. Monty ₈₄₅ 05:27, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-nominated the article for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thakur Arjun Singh. Please feel free to weigh in on the debate. Hasteur (talk) 11:37, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from STiki

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Abhishekitmbm! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Yaris678 (talk) 16:59, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohit Chauhan (actor)

I've completed your nomination of this article. The debate may be found at the above link, and you'll want to expand on your reasoning there. Remember also to read over WP:AFDHOWTO before posting more AFDs; it's a simple process once you get the hang of it. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:25, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Page on Manish Tiwari

Please do not delete my content on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manish_Tiwari and put a redirection.

I do not feel this needs to be re-directed to Manish Tewariji's link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manish_Tewari

If you have any questions, i am happy to take those Man tiwari (talk) 14:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Day 2

You have again undone my page quoting "removing vandalism", i wonder why? you are re-directing Manish Tiwari to Manish Tewari, That is amounts to incorrect information on Wikipedia, isn't that in direct conflict of Wikipedia's tenet of verifiable information and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons

'Please' send a talk to me before editing it again. (talk) 07:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Day3

you have again removed the content, can you please give reason for that, i do not think you have been fair here or being driven by something else.

Man tiwari (talk) 11:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...

Day X

you have again removed, i am not sure of the reasons for you to be so pedantic about it, but Wikipedia's terms are clear and i am adhering to those both on npov http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view and on living persons, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Avoid_self-published_sources i would take this edit to wikipedia forum for discussion

Man tiwari (talk) 12:45, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of First Post (India)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on First Post(India) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 07:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tidy: "First Post(India)" -> First Post (India). --Shirt58 (talk) 10:28, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Organizations against Corruption in India

Why did you revert my edits in Template:Corruption in India ? --Ne0 (talk) 10:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've mentioned in edit summary that those orags are not as notable.So removed them.If you find that those should be included start a thread on talk page.--Sandy (talk) 04:42, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Delhi gang rape case

Hi, I re-undid your additions. While your additional sources was helpful, the citations need to be inline the paragraph. See WP:INCITE for more information on that.

That said, I do appreciate you taking the time to work on this article, especially given the sensitivity of the topic. Legoktm (talk) 10:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of content from Manish Tewari

You deleted perfectly appropriate content with the following edit summary:

Please read/contribute on talk page before keep on adding same thing

Read what, exactly? The article on criticism linked by Sandy that has nothing whatsoever to do with the content on controversy that you removed? Content, I should note, which is not criticism: it is a factual recounting of the controversy surrounding this very public figure, just as many biographies and other similar articles have similar sections. Controversy is not criticism, and there is nothing on this talk page that has anything to do with the controversy being cited that you deleted. Also I didn't add the content, I merely cleaned it up, removing that which was not appropriate, fixed formatting, verified the content sources, and added references where needed. Suggestion: try doing some reading yourself, such as the article edit history, and of the content you are removing, before suggesting others do so. Please read WP:EW, and WP:BLP, particularly the section WP:WELLKNOWN, which states,

In the case of public figures, there will be a multitude of reliable published sources, and BLPs should simply document what these sources say. If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well-documented, it belongs in the article — even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. If you cannot find multiple reliable third-party sources documenting the allegation or incident, leave it out.

Example: "John Doe had a messy divorce from Jane Doe." Is this important to the article, and was it published by third-party reliable sources? If not, leave it out, or stick to the facts: "John Doe and Jane Doe were divorced."
Example: A politician is alleged to have had an affair. He or she denies it, but multiple major newspapers publish the allegations, and there is a public scandal. The allegation belongs in the biography, citing those sources. However, it should only state that the politician was alleged to have had the affair, not that he actually did.

Per the above guideline, I am undoing your deletion: the content in question is reliably sourced, factual, and relevant, and there was no justification for removing it, as it fits within policy. Please do not remove it again without providing evidence of strong consensus against it from multiple unbiased editors and an admin, and be sure to cite the relevant Wikipedia policies you are adhering to that justify deleting such content. If you feel you can improve it, then Be Bold and do so, but that does not include removing valid, properly sourced, and relevant material. besieged^talk 21:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vishal Dadlani, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages DON and Talaash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of content on Mehandipur_Balaji_Temple page

I saw several of changes reverted by you on the page without specifying any reasons. Could you give reasons of your deletions or undid the deletions done by you on that page. Thanks.Hrihr (talk) 14:25, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Mightier than the sword.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mightier than the sword.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:BestKeptSecreat.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BestKeptSecreat.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Abhishekitmbm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delhi Meetup

Hi,

A meetup in New Delhi is scheduled for this Sunday, 30th April. This is backed with a photography exhibition of Wiki Loves Monument in India 2016. More details here here. Do join us. Abhinav619 (talk) 11:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Article Name Change

Hi.

I got your details through Wikipedia's list of active Asian editors, and since you are online, I am reaching out to you as a new Wikipedia member (and not user). I made an account to edit a particular page, but I realised that only auto confirmed users can change the title of the page, using the 'Move' tab. Since I do not have the privilege to do that, I was hoping you would.

My issue is with a particular page titled 'Gorakshanath' which should actually be named, 'Gorakhnath'. Understandably, this is a sinister political shenanigan that is an attempt to impose the right-wing ideology of go-raksha (cow protection) down our throats. Please change the name at the earliest, if you can. It is a serious issue. This is how it starts!

Thanks. Prateek

Prateekpaul7 (talk) 13:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Support

Hello Abhishek,

Have gone through your edits in Art of Living Foundation's Page. Can I request some support from you? Can we discuss over an email/phone call?

I can be reached on rs.nadimpalli@gmail.com or 8178649332.

Thanks and Regards, Ravi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buddyrs (talk • contribs) 09:09, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]