Talk:Rame, Maker-with-Rame
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 12 July 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: (non-admin closure) NOT MOVED User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 03:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Consensus is that the non-standard disambiguation proposed is not an improvement. I note explicitly for the record that Rame, Cornwall is ambiguous (per the article's hatnote) and not an option for a title. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 03:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Rame, Maker-with-Rame → Rame, east Cornwall – Per Commons:Category talk:Rame, Caradon, use compass direction to avoid tautological disambiguation. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale: Disambiguating that way would be pretty nonstandard. What's wrong with disambiguating by civil parish, consistent with Rame, Wendron? Lennart97 (talk) 17:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Lennart97: As was said at the Commons discussion "Maker-with-Rame is a poor disambiguator for Rame. It only tells you where Rame is if you know where Rame is (!) "Rame, southeast Cornwall" would be better. The same go for the WP articles.". However based on this Rame, southeast Cornwall may be a better target. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I see no reason to go against WP:PLACEDAB here. Rame, Maker-with-Rame only tells you where Rame is if you know where Maker-with-Rame is just as Rame, Wendron only tells you where Rame is if you know where Wendron is. I see no problem with either. Lennart97 (talk) 19:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. The proposed title is just horrible. No need for a change. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:25, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.