Talk:Ralston

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Pages moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ralston (disambiguation) → Ralston — A town of less than 5,000 people that gets less than 1,000 hits is clearly not a primary topic candidate. There are just too many other things with the name "Ralston"...several other towns that are of similar size, a lot of people (one of whom started a utopian movement notable enough for its own article), not to mention the breakfast cereal company that outhits the town. Ralston needs to go to a disambig page. Purple backpack89 05:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ralston → Ralston, Renfrewshire

Survey

Support - per nomination; there is no primary topic. — Amakuru (talk) 11:48, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, the town isn't the primary topic, many other items are just as notable and likely get as many views. Making Ralston a dab is necessary. -France3470 (talk) 16:55, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support because September 2010 page views of the disambiguation page vs the article were 258/962 = 27%. That article clearly is not the primary topic. 69.3.72.249 (talk) 17:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No primary topic, even geographically. Andrewa (talk) 19:18, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per comments already made. ⇔ ChristTrekker 14:55, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ralston which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 05:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]