Jump to content

Talk:Ralph Gants

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted because... (your reason here) --Raprchju (talk) 02:37, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I copied and pasted info from the official government website, thinking it was text, but was not aware that it was an image. I removed any copyrighted info and re-typed the info and cited the website.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Ralph Gants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ralph Gants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Day of death

[edit]

I was reading articles, and a lot of them didn’t specify what day he died.

However, there’s an article from Law 360 that says he did indeed die on Monday.

https://www.law360.com/massachusetts/articles/1310010

Is this a reliable source to use instead of WCVB? MikaelaArsenault (talk) 21:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Law360 is owned by LexisNexus, which is a trusted source in the legal community. I believe that the citation would be valid (see this link for information on law360, https://www.law360.com/Law360-Fact-Sheet.pdf), however, it is also one where additional citations could be made to support that Monday was the day of his death. One source in particular is the Massachusetts Supreme Court who issued a press release on Monday announcing his death. See https://www.mass.gov/news/statement-by-the-associate-justices-of-the-supreme-judicial-court-regarding-chief-justice. Jurisdicta (talk) 18:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]