Talk:Rainow

Cheshire Low‑importance

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment Report

Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)

Peter I. Vardy 10:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Please don't add negatively biased material to this article, especially if you do not cite sources for it. Also, it is not appropriate to sign the article with your own username. -FisherQueen 18:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, It is against Wikipedia rules to be biast towards anything. JFBurton 15:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I've proposed that Rainow Primary School should be merged, primary schools are not usually notable. Snigbrook (talk) 14:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirected it, it looks like it has been merged. —Snigbrook 21:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Historical heritage

In surrounding areas to the village there are standing stone markers that are thought to have been placed there before 3000 BC, and similar ones can be found in other areas of Derbyshire. These are large stones that have been discovered in perfectly straight lines if you look at them on a map.

The original reason for them being placed there is unknown, but archaeological digs have showed the route was later adapted to be a pack horse route and a roman road.

There are many stories to the original purpose for these stones being placed in this way, the most popular of which is one based on prehistoric worship rituals. It is thought that there were many other lines of stones in the area that have since been destroyed, buried or moved. They were in certain patterns to worship the spirits that would protect them from evil. Due to the only partial evidence that remains, detailed theories of what they were worshiping is unable to be made by historians. There have been some theories put forward that at each of these sites would surrounded and draped with sacred objects and signs. So far no evidence has been found of this theory but it is hard to confirm or deny as the likelihood is these symbols would be easily perishable or have been removed by people using the route or farmers at a later date.

I've moved the above new material to here for discussion. I have certain problems with it:

It's entirely unsourced.
The contributor is new to Wikipedia.
Some of the statements are rather unencyclopaedic and seem rather dubious, verging on Original Research, e.g. that the stones are in "perfectly straight lines": a look at the "Historical Map" in http://www.rainow.org/TheStoryOfRainowRedux.pdf, the only source I've been able to find (admittedly I didn't spend a long time looking), doesn't really support this claim.

Dave.Dunford (talk) 16:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rainow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]