Talk:Rainbow Canyon (California)

.

A fact from Rainbow Canyon (California) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 April 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the US military refers to Death Valley's Rainbow Canyon as Star Wars Canyon?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rainbow Canyon (California).

Wikipedia

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

United States: 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Rainbow Canyon location

Rainbow Canyon, using the coordinates in the article, is not 250 miles east of Los Angeles. Even the attached map of California shows it is much more northerly than easterly. Also, the distance is roughly 165 miles from downtown Los Angeles, using Google Maps measuring tool. I'm changing the article to reflect this. Jamesfett (talk) 14:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jamesfett, I took the number from published RS such as [1] and did not fact-check it! But in looking at a map, I certainly agree with you. MB 15:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile phone GPS unavailability

GPS is GPS, whether it is built into a mobile phone or provided by a dedicated GPS unit. One would have to be in a narrow, deep slot canyon in order to be unable to get some kind of GPS service, but the terrain in the Rainbow Canyon area doesn't fit the description. Simultaneous view of three GPS satellites is sufficient to get a complete three-dimensional location fix, although in mountainous terrain there can be drop-outs when only one or two satellites are in view, and it can take a many minutes for the GPS receiver to achieve a fix. Source Tom Demerly may have meant well, but I suspect he's unclear about the difference between GPS and cell tower triangulation. — Quicksilver (Hydrargyrum)^{T @} 19:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Mach Loop needs to be linked in the See Also section

I added it but someone undid the edit. Their rationale: it's already in the body of the article. That doesn't matter, because you shouldn't need to hunt through an article to find a link you're looking for. I don't want to get in an edit war but reverting my edit was stupid. Ninjalectual (talk) 01:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ninjalectual, it should not be in "See also" per WP:SEEALSO: the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body. Following project guidelines is not stupid. MB 03:35, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia primarily uses inline links to connect to other article topics. The "See also" section is a place to collect links that ought to be in the article somewhere, but which aren't yet there. A perfect article doesn't need a "See also" section—it should discuss all topics that are relevant and link to them inline. Your complaint that you "shouldn't need to hunt through an article to find a link you're looking for" makes no sense. If the user knows what they are looking for, they should type it in the search box. If they don't know exactly what they are looking for but know they want articles on places that are similar to this one, the See also section is the wrong place to look. The right place to look for articles on similar places would be in the categories list at the bottom of the article. Category:Low flying, for example. Trying to browse Wikipedia by browsing only through See also sections will not work; the encyclopedia is not built that way. The category system is built for browsing.--Srleffler (talk) 16:54, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]