Talk:Raid on Makin Island

Military history: Asian / Japanese / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Micronesia: Kiribati Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Micronesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Micronesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicronesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MicronesiaTemplate:WikiProject MicronesiaMicronesia articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kiribati.

Japan: Military history Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 07:55, November 22, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Since I got a message from —wwoods, I rechecked my source, Blair's Silent Victory. I thought it was Narwhal; Blair, who I would rely on, correctly says Nautilus, pp.308-9 & 315-6. Trekphiler 00:32, 19 July 2007 (UTC) (I'm always getting them crossed up. Argonaut, too....)[reply]

The article presents numbers that create a very confusing picture. "At the time of the Makin raid the total force opposing the American landing consisted of 71 armed personnel""The Japanese...launched two banzai charges, which were wiped out by the Raiders, thus killing most of the Japanese on the island". we now have at least 165 raiders from an initial force of almost 200 (since later 93 made it to the submarines on the first try, and another 72 on the last try, there were at least 165 in action at this point) facing fewer than 35 japanese. then 8 more japanese, and the commanding officer (warrant officer kanemitsu), are killed. we are now down to perhaps 25 japanese facing at least 165 raiders (the number of raiders who ended up making it off the island in the end). then 93 raiders withdraw to the submarine(s). after losing most of their equipment in the surf, at least 72 raiders, including 20 fully-armed raiders, offer to surrender to the badly-mauled and totally outnumbered japanese survivors. this is incomprehensible. presumably the raiders who lost their equipment could salvage at least somea arms and ammunition from fallen japanese or fallen comrades. and there were still 20 fully-armed raiders facing a roughly equal number of japanese. there is reference to 'the japanese commander' but that individual was killed earlier. all in all this is a highly confusing collection of facts and details that fails to create a coherent narrative and raises more questions than it answers. [i avoid capital letters due to handicapped hands; i'm not trying to make a statement or be rudely sloppy.] — Preceding unsigned comment added by BGD808 (talk • contribs) 04:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Updated Some Numbers

This was a little sloppy with numbers and references for Japanese sources. I have used some Japanese sources to confirm and verify the total number of Japanese troops on Butaritari at the time of the raid and total casualities. These numbers are almost certainly correct and are not of the wildly high numbers which Carlson cites... in fact they could not be that high because there were never that many Japanese on the island in the first place. I have, so far, found no Japanese source with casualties outside of garrison members. If I find others in the planes of small boats I will add. I suspect the boat casualities are garrison members and would be included in the 46 killed/mia. If you add two flying boats with flight crew of about 8 members each you will get 62 total Japanese casualties. I suspect this is about the right number... but if and when I can confirm either estimate I will enter it and cite published sources.

I also put in the first name and correct rank of the Japanese commanding Warrant Officer. Sargent Major was incorrect term for this Naval Officer.

The number of Japanese planes is cited at 13, but these were not on Makin Island during the raid and were attached to Tarawa garrison. The Butaritari garrison did not have any direct aircraft attached. So I do not think it is useful to include them in the troop strength attached. Canadaman1 (talk) 19:43, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Offer to surrender

Is it correct that having killed most of a garrison, the American attackers then offered to surrender to the survivors, when they were initially unable to withdraw? That is not consistent with the account in History.com.119.224.100.246 (talk) 22:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History.com is not always a reliable source. Yes, there was thought of surrender. --Yaush (talk) 16:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Makin Island raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061207083134/http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/cno/n87/usw/issue_10/submarine_commandos.html to http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/cno/n87/usw/issue_10/submarine_commandos.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Makin Island raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]