Talk:Raheja Developers
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Raheja Developers Limited)
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Raheja Developers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Raheja Developers be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in India may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The contents of the Raheja Production page were merged into Raheja Developers. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Some Updated News Items. Can these be incorporated.
[edit]There are some negative news items which need to reflect on this Builder's Home Page. As I have real world disputes with Rahejas, Leoaugust would request your opinion on this.
- FIR over ‘poor construction’ after DTCP goes to cops against realtor .. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/85084560.cms
- रहेजा डेवलपर्स की वेदांता और अथर्वा सोसायटी में अनियमिताओं को लेकर डीटीपी ने दिया नोटिस
https://www.jagran.com/haryana/gurgaon-dtp-gave-notice-regarding-irregularities-in-vedanta-and-atharva-society-of-raheja-developers-21737405.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leoaugust (talk • contribs) 03:23, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- घटिया निर्माण और मरम्मत नहीं करने पर रहेजा डेवलपर्स के खिलाफ मामला दर्ज
https://www.jagran.com/haryana/gurgaon-raheja-develpoers-21895738.html
- Rera demands affidavit from developer on repair work http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/86129733.cms
- Gurugram: Poor upkeep adds to Raheja residents worries http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/75212674.cms
Leoaugust (talk) 02:59, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Could you provide the exact text (what and where) you want included so it can be reviewed? --RegentsPark (comment) 13:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks RegentsPark, will draft a small write up and post here.
- Regarding my previous edit which you have reverted back, it is incorrect to say that I can't update the article. Here is the specific clause https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Leoaugust#:~:text=if%20you%20want%20to%20directly,is%20simple%2C%20factual%2C%20uncontroversial%20content. Would appreciate if you would reconsider your revert-back to my previous update. Leoaugust (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- You're right and can make factual edits. Sorry about that, I've self reverted. --RegentsPark (comment) 12:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks RegentsPark, much appreciated. Leoaugust (talk) 01:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- You're right and can make factual edits. Sorry about that, I've self reverted. --RegentsPark (comment) 12:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
In recent edits it is falsely claimed that Rajesh Raheja & Udit Raheja are key people in Raheja Developers. They are not even connected to this company.
Categories:
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Stub-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/01 June 2014
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in India
- Paid contributions with no listed employer
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
- Articles edited by connected contributors