Jump to content

Talk:Rafael Nadal career statistics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Based on...

[edit]

This article is based on the main Rafael Nadal article as of this version. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Singles Performance Timeline

[edit]

The singles performance timeline contains a lot of obvious wrong statistics. May someone please fix them? Errors most obvious for masters series win-loss. Salmon (talk) 08:55, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the table has been messed up. This should be fixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.24.65.31 (talk) 07:49, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Singles Performance Timeline section says that Rafael Nadal has won the 2011 ATP World Tour Finals and made it to the finals of the 2011 Paris Masters. As of October 29, 2011, neither of these tournaments have taken place, and therefore, these things are not true. If it could be corrected by someone who knows how to do such things, that would be greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.61.59.111 (talk) 04:45, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:09, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Colours

[edit]

Is there some compelling reason for the colours (so many colours) in these tables?   pablohablo. 20:28, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Limiting Head to Head

[edit]

There should be limits about how much encounters are required and how good/bad the best ranking of that player can be. I think only players ranked among the top 20, which Nadal played against at least 6 times. That would at the moment drop Kohlschreiber, Melzer and Fish. But from the start of that Head-to-Head-section (since it is not that old) it would only drop Kohlschreiber. There would be really much players with 5 encounters to add otherwise. Kohlschreiber is mentioned although his best is only 22. Starace would be the next with 6 encounters (best ranking 27) (Correct me, if I am wrong. I only checked the current rankings down to 150 ;-)). On the other hand the article could keep only the players which Nadal played the most against and limit it to a fixed amount. But the last additions to the Head-to-Head section were Melzer with only three encounters (best ranking 11) (and Fish, but ok, he is one among the ones with 5 encounters, best ranking 17) and there are lots of more significant Head-to-Head we must add, if we would keep Melzer. Also we should add a short comment, so that it does not grow much bigger when some people think, hm but I would like to see that encounter and it misses. Hey, that is Wikipedia, I can simply add it. Sorry, my english is not the best, I know.--188.194.5.11 (talk) 18:27, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what has been done to improve what has been said above, but in its current form it is still confusing. Maybe it's just because of the introductional sentence, but it should be checked to see whether it's his lifetime overall ratio or just a "censored data". Lajbi Holla @ meCP 10:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well to answer the IP it should be any player who Nadal has played, who has appeared in the top 10 at some point. KnowIG (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with KnowIG, and the same goes for any other head-to-head tables on other articles. Boddefan2009 (talk) 16:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, that further limiting should be done. I have noticed some improvements. The sentence restricting to players among the top 30 is "new". Back then, there was no restriction rule at all. It was simply "Head to Head". Also the data meeting that restriction has become much more complete. (Maybe it is complete?) Best regards, your IP from above.--79.215.119.101 (talk) 11:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hyphens and stuff

[edit]

Though I don't really work on on this particular article much, and since this page is edited frequently, I went ahead and fixed the hyphen/ndash and tiebreaks to conform to wikipedia tennis MOS standards. Hopefully editors will continue the effort here and on other tennis articles. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:20, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Milestone wins

[edit]

How about milestone wins? age and match of the win number 1, 100, 200, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.86.235.249 (talk) 16:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information erased

[edit]

Why erase the extra information I wrote on players with winning records against Rafa?--190.7.201.2 (talk) 19:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content, no summary

[edit]

We have an anon editor or two removing the actual tournament names of the Masters 1000 events. These are listed as Nadal having won an event 4, 5, 6 times or more. Well you don't win a Shanghai or a Madrid. You win a Shanghai Masters or a Madrid Open. No summary is ever given and no answer on the personal talk page. Tennis Project tries to use the full non-sponsored tournament names. It's not difficult and is easier for our many readers to follow. That is our bottom line... our readers. Having the tournament name along with number wins is better for our readers than just a city. I realize not every article conforms but we do try. Some help as to why can be found at the Tennis project Guidelines. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:34, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Davydenko leads Head-to-Head

[edit]

Davydenko leads 6-5 in their head-to-head meetings, not 3-5 as stated here. http://www.atpworldtour.com/Players/Head-To-Head.aspx?pId=N409&oId=D402 Aassdddai (talk) 12:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Head-to-head vs. Top 30 ranked players

[edit]

A lot of missing top 30 players who played against him; Klizan, Acasuso, Portas, Malisse, Dent, Spadea, Mirnyi, Santoro, Calleri, El Aynaoui, Squillari, Schalken, Mantilla, Philippoussis, T. Johansson, Kucera, Costa, Novak, and Bjorkman. Also many outdated high ranking. As march 16th, 2015, Nadal has played against 116 top 30 players. Please correct.

Tommy Boy (talk) 03:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rafael Nadal career statistics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:43, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Rafael Nadal career statistics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:23, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]