This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
Could you elaborate on the reason for the notability template on Rachel Sussman? The template asks for reliable secondary sources to be added, but I believe the article already has these. Do you disagree? --Bsherr (talk) 19:08, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article demonstrates that the subject has received significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Doesn't it? --Bsherr (talk) 19:15, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Many many hundreds of photographers have their work published in assorted magazines it doesn't necessarily make them notable? I'm happy to be proved wrong though. TeapotgeorgeTalk19:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
